THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BETWEEN RECOUNT TEXT AND DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT SMAN 18 MAKASSAR

Dewi Astari Putry Utami, Hj Nurfaisah Sahib, Ulfah Syam
{"title":"THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BETWEEN RECOUNT TEXT AND DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT SMAN 18 MAKASSAR","authors":"Dewi Astari Putry Utami, Hj Nurfaisah Sahib, Ulfah Syam","doi":"10.52208/aellj.v6i2.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This writing aims to analysis the difference between students’ ability in writing recount text and descriptive text at SMAN 18 Makassar (comparative analysis). The population of this writing was the tenth-grade students of SMAN 18 Makassar at the first semester 2021/2022 academic year. The writer took 270 students as population. The data were obtained from the writing text. The writer choose of class X IPA 3 and the writer took 30 students as a sample. The results of the writing used inferential analysis of t-test by SPSS v.16. It showed that there was a significant difference in the students’ mean score    writing ability between recount text and descriptive text. The mean score of the students’ writing test recount text is 82.20 while descriptive text is 76.43. The significance value calculated 0.014 is smaller than 0.05 (P-value = 0.014 < 0.05). Therefore, the hypothesis of these writing was accepted. It means that, there were a Comparative difference of Students’ Writing Ability Between Recount Text and Descriptive Text at SMAN 18 Makassar. The writer concluded, that the students are easier to express ideas, understanding, composed and write a recount text than descriptive text. Based the results above, the writer can difference between students’ ability in writing recount text and descriptive text at SMAN 18     Makassar (comparative analysis).","PeriodicalId":131114,"journal":{"name":"THE ACADEMIC: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE ACADEMIC: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52208/aellj.v6i2.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This writing aims to analysis the difference between students’ ability in writing recount text and descriptive text at SMAN 18 Makassar (comparative analysis). The population of this writing was the tenth-grade students of SMAN 18 Makassar at the first semester 2021/2022 academic year. The writer took 270 students as population. The data were obtained from the writing text. The writer choose of class X IPA 3 and the writer took 30 students as a sample. The results of the writing used inferential analysis of t-test by SPSS v.16. It showed that there was a significant difference in the students’ mean score    writing ability between recount text and descriptive text. The mean score of the students’ writing test recount text is 82.20 while descriptive text is 76.43. The significance value calculated 0.014 is smaller than 0.05 (P-value = 0.014 < 0.05). Therefore, the hypothesis of these writing was accepted. It means that, there were a Comparative difference of Students’ Writing Ability Between Recount Text and Descriptive Text at SMAN 18 Makassar. The writer concluded, that the students are easier to express ideas, understanding, composed and write a recount text than descriptive text. Based the results above, the writer can difference between students’ ability in writing recount text and descriptive text at SMAN 18     Makassar (comparative analysis).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
望加锡中学学生叙述文与描述文写作能力的比较分析
本文旨在分析望加锡第18中学学生叙述文本和描述文本写作能力的差异(对比分析)。本文的研究对象是2021/2022学年第一学期斯曼18望加锡十年级的学生。作者以270名学生作为总人数。数据来自书面文本。笔者选择ipa3班X班,选取30名学生作为样本。写作结果采用SPSS v.16进行t检验的推理分析。结果表明,学生的平均分写作能力在叙述文本和描述文本之间存在显著差异。学生写作测试叙述文本的平均得分为82.20分,描述文本的平均得分为76.43分。0.014计算的显著性值小于0.05 (p值= 0.014 < 0.05)。因此,这些文字的假设被接受了。也就是说,在望加锡第18中学,学生的叙述文本和描述文本的写作能力存在比较差异。作者的结论是,学生更容易表达想法,理解,组成和写叙述文本比描述性文本。基于以上结果,笔者可以对比分析第18届望加锡中学学生叙述文本和描述文本写作能力的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GESTURES FOR LEARNING VOCABULARY TOWARDS STUDENTS’ SPECIAL NEEDS (DEAF) USING JEOPARDY GAME TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE IN UPT SPF SMP NEGERI 35 MAKASSAR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGLISH DAY PROGRAM IN THE STUDENT'S SPEAKING SKILL AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SMAN 18 MAKASSAR THE EFFECT OF USING REVIEW STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL AT SMAN 18 MAKASSAR Penggunaan Sistem Poin Partisipasi untuk Kemampuan Berbicara Siswa pada Siswa Kelas Delapan SMPN 8 Makassar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1