MONITORING AND EVALUATION FOR EDUCATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN EDMUND RICE FOUNDATION AUSTRALIA NAIROBI COUNTY

Patrick Matara, Felistus Mwikali, Mary Mutisya
{"title":"MONITORING AND EVALUATION FOR EDUCATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN EDMUND RICE FOUNDATION AUSTRALIA NAIROBI COUNTY","authors":"Patrick Matara, Felistus Mwikali, Mary Mutisya","doi":"10.47941/jepm.1032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The research examined the techniques used for accountability at Edmund Rice Foundation Australia Kenya (ARFA-K), in Lang’ata, Nairobi County Kenya. The study sought to establish if M&E system promotes accountability in education to management or performance. Therefore, to expound on the practicability of M&E process in management accountability especially at ERFA-K. \nMethodology: The research employed mixed research method. The theory of change and empowerment theory in this study conceivably showed the application of M&E in promoting accountability in education. The study adopted descriptive research method. This research adopted the descriptive survey design approach since it involved collecting primary data to test or answer questions concerning the current status of the subject under study. The confidence level in this research was 95% with confidence interval of 9.32 from the populations of 141 at ERFA-K with sample size of 120 participants. Purposive sampling was used to select the 120 respondents that comprise of 4 Directors, 6 Managers, 11 Project Managers, 4 Accountants, 78 Subordinates (lower employees), and 38 Volunteers (non-staff workers). The 141 of 120 computed to 85% for the researcher objective population through separated testing, which was identical to an example size of 120 participants. The research tools for the study were interview guide, structured questionnaires and observation check list. Qualitative data was analyzed and presented in a prose form while quantitative data was analyzed by use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 and presented in tables, pie chart and bar graphs. \nFindings: The study revealed that there was no accountability in the organization and it affected the implementation of activities appropriately. Majority 69.7% reported that the tools and techniques had challenges to use hence making organization to outsource experts. Lack of stakeholders’ involvement as result of failing to develop a sector that purely deals with M&E system such as M&E plans, indicators and tools hence lowering accountability and misappropriation of resources. \nUnique contributions to theory, practice and policy: The study concluded that application of M&E for education and accountability greatly affected the organization in the utilization of budgeted resources well which led to merging of projects since there were no funds. The study recommended that ERFA-K projects must clearly involve stakeholders adequately in M&E activities in all levels to enhance application of M&E system for accountability","PeriodicalId":293107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/jepm.1032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The research examined the techniques used for accountability at Edmund Rice Foundation Australia Kenya (ARFA-K), in Lang’ata, Nairobi County Kenya. The study sought to establish if M&E system promotes accountability in education to management or performance. Therefore, to expound on the practicability of M&E process in management accountability especially at ERFA-K. Methodology: The research employed mixed research method. The theory of change and empowerment theory in this study conceivably showed the application of M&E in promoting accountability in education. The study adopted descriptive research method. This research adopted the descriptive survey design approach since it involved collecting primary data to test or answer questions concerning the current status of the subject under study. The confidence level in this research was 95% with confidence interval of 9.32 from the populations of 141 at ERFA-K with sample size of 120 participants. Purposive sampling was used to select the 120 respondents that comprise of 4 Directors, 6 Managers, 11 Project Managers, 4 Accountants, 78 Subordinates (lower employees), and 38 Volunteers (non-staff workers). The 141 of 120 computed to 85% for the researcher objective population through separated testing, which was identical to an example size of 120 participants. The research tools for the study were interview guide, structured questionnaires and observation check list. Qualitative data was analyzed and presented in a prose form while quantitative data was analyzed by use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 and presented in tables, pie chart and bar graphs. Findings: The study revealed that there was no accountability in the organization and it affected the implementation of activities appropriately. Majority 69.7% reported that the tools and techniques had challenges to use hence making organization to outsource experts. Lack of stakeholders’ involvement as result of failing to develop a sector that purely deals with M&E system such as M&E plans, indicators and tools hence lowering accountability and misappropriation of resources. Unique contributions to theory, practice and policy: The study concluded that application of M&E for education and accountability greatly affected the organization in the utilization of budgeted resources well which led to merging of projects since there were no funds. The study recommended that ERFA-K projects must clearly involve stakeholders adequately in M&E activities in all levels to enhance application of M&E system for accountability
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监测和评价埃德蒙·赖斯基金会澳大利亚内罗毕县的教育和问责制
目的:本研究审查了位于肯尼亚内罗毕县朗阿塔的埃德蒙·赖斯澳大利亚肯尼亚基金会(ARFA-K)用于问责制的技术。这项研究旨在确定教育与评估制度是否促进了教育对管理或绩效的问责制。因此,阐述了管理问责制中绩效评估过程的实用性,特别是在ERFA-K。研究方法:本研究采用混合研究方法。本研究中的变革理论和授权理论,令人信服地展示了M&E在促进教育问责制方面的应用。本研究采用描述性研究方法。本研究采用描述性调查设计方法,因为它涉及收集原始数据来测试或回答有关被研究对象的现状的问题。本研究的置信水平为95%,置信区间为9.32,来自ERFA-K的141个人群,样本量为120名参与者。有目的的抽样选择了120名受访者,其中包括4名董事,6名经理,11名项目经理,4名会计师,78名下属(低级员工)和38名志愿者(非工作人员)。通过分离测试,120人中的141人计算为研究人员目标人群的85%,这与120名参与者的样本大小相同。本研究的研究工具为访谈指南、结构化问卷和观察检查表。定性数据分析以散文形式呈现,定量数据分析使用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)第26版,以表格、饼图和条形图的形式呈现。研究发现:该组织没有问责制,影响了活动的适当实施。大多数69.7%的人报告说,工具和技术在使用上有挑战,因此使组织外包专家。缺乏利益相关者的参与,因为没有发展一个纯粹处理M&E系统的部门,如M&E计划、指标和工具,从而降低了问责制和挪用资源。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:该研究得出结论,在教育和问责制方面应用M&E极大地影响了组织对预算资源的利用,导致项目合并,因为没有资金。研究建议ERFA-K项目必须明确地让利益相关者充分参与各级的评估活动,以加强评估制度的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurship Education as Panacea to Job Creation among University Graduates: A Case of ZCAS University Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance of Construction Companies in Port Harcourt Stakeholder Identification and Performance of World Bank Funded Projects in Kenya Government and Program Implementation Bodies Policies on Performance of Women Empowerment Projects in Dagoretti Area, Nairobi County, Kenya Project Team Planning and Performance of Housing Projects in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1