Establishing a modified CREAM approach for reliability evaluation

Chao He, D. Söffker
{"title":"Establishing a modified CREAM approach for reliability evaluation","authors":"Chao He, D. Söffker","doi":"10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The human factors area is one of the core field of industrial safety. It is deeply recognized that human factors are the main cause of accidents and breakdowns in various industries. Physiological mental states of human operators, like fatigue or vigilance, are crucial for the evaluation of human operators reliability. However, the shortages of measurements of physiological mental states limit their application. So human reliability analysis (HRA) is developed and many techniques have been developed. Among these techniques, cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) is often applied and discussed. Due to the application limits of common performance conditions (CPCs) in original CREAM approach, it is advised to generate a new list of CPCs for the application domain if CREAM approach is applied to other domains. In this contribution, a new approach defining a situated and dynamical human reliability measure is established. The approach is based on the well-known CREAM approach, which is modified with respect to the use in dynamical context. The new list of CPCs, their levels and corresponding effects on human reliability are determined. A new index, human performance reliability score (HPRS), is proposed for the assessment of human operator reliability. Finally, the applicability and correctness of the newly established approach is verified by data analysis.","PeriodicalId":132917,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The human factors area is one of the core field of industrial safety. It is deeply recognized that human factors are the main cause of accidents and breakdowns in various industries. Physiological mental states of human operators, like fatigue or vigilance, are crucial for the evaluation of human operators reliability. However, the shortages of measurements of physiological mental states limit their application. So human reliability analysis (HRA) is developed and many techniques have been developed. Among these techniques, cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) is often applied and discussed. Due to the application limits of common performance conditions (CPCs) in original CREAM approach, it is advised to generate a new list of CPCs for the application domain if CREAM approach is applied to other domains. In this contribution, a new approach defining a situated and dynamical human reliability measure is established. The approach is based on the well-known CREAM approach, which is modified with respect to the use in dynamical context. The new list of CPCs, their levels and corresponding effects on human reliability are determined. A new index, human performance reliability score (HPRS), is proposed for the assessment of human operator reliability. Finally, the applicability and correctness of the newly established approach is verified by data analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立一种改进的可靠性评估方法
人因领域是工业安全的核心领域之一。人们深刻认识到,人为因素是造成各种行业事故和故障的主要原因。操作人员的疲劳、警惕性等生理心理状态是评估操作人员可靠性的关键。然而,生理心理状态测量的不足限制了它们的应用。因此,人的可靠性分析(human reliability analysis, HRA)得到了发展,并发展了许多相关技术。在这些技术中,认知可靠性和误差分析方法(CREAM)经常被应用和讨论。由于原CREAM方法中常见性能条件(common performance conditions, cpc)的应用限制,如果将CREAM方法应用于其他域,建议重新生成该应用域的常见性能条件列表。在这篇贡献中,建立了一种新的方法来定义一个定位的和动态的人的可靠性度量。该方法基于著名的CREAM方法,并对其在动态环境中的使用进行了修改。确定了新的CPCs清单、它们的水平和对人体可靠性的相应影响。提出了一种评价人工操作人员可靠性的新指标——人功可靠性评分(HPRS)。最后,通过数据分析验证了新方法的适用性和正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finite Time Sliding Mode Control of Connected Vehicle Platoons Guaranteeing String Stability User detection of threats with different security measures Driver Hazard Response When Processing On-road and In-vehicle Messaging of Non-Safety-Related Information Towards trustworthiness and transparency in social human-robot interaction Collaborative Environmental Monitoring through Teams of Trusted IoT devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1