The Impact of Banking Regulation on Voluntary Disclosures: Evidence from the Dodd-Frank Act

Anya Kleymenova, Li Zhang
{"title":"The Impact of Banking Regulation on Voluntary Disclosures: Evidence from the Dodd-Frank Act","authors":"Anya Kleymenova, Li Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3332488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate how the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) affects voluntary disclosures of large bank holding companies (BHCs) relative to other banks and unregulated firms in the financial sector. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that following the introduction of the DFA, large banks become less likely to issue earnings forecasts containing bad news. They also reduce the frequency of issuing earnings forecasts but increase the frequency of providing forecasts for dividends and return on assets. In earnings-related conference calls, managers of large banks offer information with incrementally higher numerical and forward-looking intensity in both the prepared remarks and their answers to analysts’ questions. Finally, we find that large banks provide incrementally less information than other banks about certain regulated activities and instead focus more on commercial banking financial performance and market innovation. Our findings provide the first evidence of the unintended consequences of the DFA on changes in affected banks’ voluntary disclosures, an important component of the information environment.","PeriodicalId":114245,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth: Fama-Miller Working Paper Series","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth: Fama-Miller Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We investigate how the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) affects voluntary disclosures of large bank holding companies (BHCs) relative to other banks and unregulated firms in the financial sector. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that following the introduction of the DFA, large banks become less likely to issue earnings forecasts containing bad news. They also reduce the frequency of issuing earnings forecasts but increase the frequency of providing forecasts for dividends and return on assets. In earnings-related conference calls, managers of large banks offer information with incrementally higher numerical and forward-looking intensity in both the prepared remarks and their answers to analysts’ questions. Finally, we find that large banks provide incrementally less information than other banks about certain regulated activities and instead focus more on commercial banking financial performance and market innovation. Our findings provide the first evidence of the unintended consequences of the DFA on changes in affected banks’ voluntary disclosures, an important component of the information environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行监管对自愿披露的影响:来自多德-弗兰克法案的证据
我们调查了多德-弗兰克法案(DFA)如何影响大型银行控股公司(BHCs)相对于其他银行和金融部门不受监管的公司的自愿披露。使用差异中的差异研究设计,我们发现引入DFA后,大型银行发布包含坏消息的盈利预测的可能性降低。它们还减少了发布收益预测的频率,但增加了提供股息和资产回报预测的频率。在与收益相关的电话会议上,大型银行的经理们在准备好的发言和对分析师问题的回答中,提供的信息在数字和前瞻性方面的强度都越来越高。最后,我们发现,与其他银行相比,大型银行提供的有关某些监管活动的信息越来越少,相反,它们更关注商业银行的财务业绩和市场创新。我们的研究结果首次证明,DFA对受影响银行自愿披露(信息环境的重要组成部分)的变化产生了意想不到的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Option-Implied Spreads and Option Risk Premia Time Series Momentum around FOMC Meetings Business Income Taxes Government and Nonprofits The Impact of Banking Regulation on Voluntary Disclosures: Evidence from the Dodd-Frank Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1