KARAKTERISTIKE PRAVNIH LEKOVA, POSEBNO U PARNIČNOM POSTUPKU I KROZ POLOŽAJ UMEŠAČA

Jelena Čanović
{"title":"KARAKTERISTIKE PRAVNIH LEKOVA, POSEBNO U PARNIČNOM POSTUPKU I KROZ POLOŽAJ UMEŠAČA","authors":"Jelena Čanović","doi":"10.46793/gp.1002.091c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In domestic civil procedural law, the legal nature of legal remedies, the reasons for legal security, as well as need for providing judicial protection within a reasonable time have led to rationalization of the legal remedy system through multiple restrictions. The paper highlights these restrictions regarding their number, contestable decisions, deadlines within which they can be declared, the circle of persons authorized to file them, the scope of rebuttal, reasons for filing, etc. The characteristics of legal remedies, as well as the assumptions for their declaration are analyzed in this paper, considering that these characteristics and assumption represent the basis for formulating different criteria according to which numerous classifications of legal remedies have been made, which also have practical and doctrinal importance. While the general characteristics of legal remedies derive from their legal nature, the Civil Procedure Act regulates the specific characteristics of each envisaged legal remedy. The analysis of the characteristics of remedies is deepened by monitoring the procedural position of the intervener in the stages of the procedure initiated with filing of regular and extraordinary remedies. In this context, certain controversial issues have been identified to which theory and practice have not answered, or on which they have not taken a unified position.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.1002.091c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In domestic civil procedural law, the legal nature of legal remedies, the reasons for legal security, as well as need for providing judicial protection within a reasonable time have led to rationalization of the legal remedy system through multiple restrictions. The paper highlights these restrictions regarding their number, contestable decisions, deadlines within which they can be declared, the circle of persons authorized to file them, the scope of rebuttal, reasons for filing, etc. The characteristics of legal remedies, as well as the assumptions for their declaration are analyzed in this paper, considering that these characteristics and assumption represent the basis for formulating different criteria according to which numerous classifications of legal remedies have been made, which also have practical and doctrinal importance. While the general characteristics of legal remedies derive from their legal nature, the Civil Procedure Act regulates the specific characteristics of each envisaged legal remedy. The analysis of the characteristics of remedies is deepened by monitoring the procedural position of the intervener in the stages of the procedure initiated with filing of regular and extraordinary remedies. In this context, certain controversial issues have been identified to which theory and practice have not answered, or on which they have not taken a unified position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在国内民事诉讼法中,法律救济的法律性质、法律保障的理由以及在合理时间内提供司法保护的需要,使得法律救济制度在多重限制下趋于合理化。本文强调了这些限制,包括它们的数量、可争议的决定、可以宣布的截止日期、授权提交它们的人的圈子、反驳的范围、提交的理由等。本文分析了法律救济的特征及其声明的假设,认为这些特征和假设是制定不同标准的基础,并据此对法律救济进行了许多分类,具有实践和理论意义。虽然法律救济的一般特征源于其法律性质,但《民事诉讼法》规定了每一种设想的法律救济的具体特征。通过监测干预者在以提交常规和非常补救措施开始的程序阶段中的程序地位,加深了对补救措施特征的分析。在这方面,已经确定了一些有争议的问题,理论和实践没有回答这些问题,或者他们没有采取统一的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO: LEGE LATA AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS NABAVLjANjE, DRŽANjE I NOŠENjE ORUŽJA PO ZAKONU O ORUŽJU I MUNICIJI U REPUBLICI SRBIJI LJUDSKA PRAVA NA RADNOM MJESTU – PRAVO NA PRIVATNOST VIŠESTRUKI POVRAT U POZITIVNOM KRIVIČNOM ZAKONODAVSTVU PRAVNA DRŽAVA I MEDIJI – KANONI MEDIJSKOG PRAVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1