Scalable social sensing of interdependent phenomena

Shiguang Wang, Lu Su, Shen Li, Shaohan Hu, Md. Tanvir Al Amin, Hongwei Wang, Shuochao Yao, Lance M. Kaplan, T. Abdelzaher
{"title":"Scalable social sensing of interdependent phenomena","authors":"Shiguang Wang, Lu Su, Shen Li, Shaohan Hu, Md. Tanvir Al Amin, Hongwei Wang, Shuochao Yao, Lance M. Kaplan, T. Abdelzaher","doi":"10.1145/2737095.2737114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of mobile sensing and communication devices in the possession of the average individual generated much recent interest in social sensing applications. Significant advances were made on the problem of uncovering ground truth from observations made by participants of unknown reliability. The problem, also called fact-finding commonly arises in applications where unvetted individuals may opt in to report phenomena of interest. For example, reliability of individuals might be unknown when they can join a participatory sensing campaign simply by downloading a smartphone app. This paper extends past social sensing literature by offering a scalable approach for exploiting dependencies between observed variables to increase fact-finding accuracy. Prior work assumed that reported facts are independent, or incurred exponential complexity when dependencies were present. In contrast, this paper presents the first scalable approach for accommodating dependency graphs between observed states. The approach is tested using real-life data collected in the aftermath of hurricane Sandy on availability of gas, food, and medical supplies, as well as extensive simulations. Evaluation shows that combining expected correlation graphs (of outages) with reported observations of unknown reliability, results in a much more reliable reconstruction of ground truth from the noisy social sensing data. We also show that correlation graphs can help test hypotheses regarding underlying causes, when different hypotheses are associated with different correlation patterns. For example, an observed outage profile can be attributed to a supplier outage or to excessive local demand. The two differ in expected correlations in observed outages, enabling joint identification of both the actual outages and their underlying causes.","PeriodicalId":318992,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2737095.2737114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

The proliferation of mobile sensing and communication devices in the possession of the average individual generated much recent interest in social sensing applications. Significant advances were made on the problem of uncovering ground truth from observations made by participants of unknown reliability. The problem, also called fact-finding commonly arises in applications where unvetted individuals may opt in to report phenomena of interest. For example, reliability of individuals might be unknown when they can join a participatory sensing campaign simply by downloading a smartphone app. This paper extends past social sensing literature by offering a scalable approach for exploiting dependencies between observed variables to increase fact-finding accuracy. Prior work assumed that reported facts are independent, or incurred exponential complexity when dependencies were present. In contrast, this paper presents the first scalable approach for accommodating dependency graphs between observed states. The approach is tested using real-life data collected in the aftermath of hurricane Sandy on availability of gas, food, and medical supplies, as well as extensive simulations. Evaluation shows that combining expected correlation graphs (of outages) with reported observations of unknown reliability, results in a much more reliable reconstruction of ground truth from the noisy social sensing data. We also show that correlation graphs can help test hypotheses regarding underlying causes, when different hypotheses are associated with different correlation patterns. For example, an observed outage profile can be attributed to a supplier outage or to excessive local demand. The two differ in expected correlations in observed outages, enabling joint identification of both the actual outages and their underlying causes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相互依存现象的可扩展社会感知
普通个人拥有的移动传感和通信设备的激增引起了最近对社会传感应用的兴趣。在从可靠性未知的参与者的观察中发现地面真相的问题上取得了重大进展。这个问题,也被称为事实发现,通常出现在未经审查的个人可能选择报告感兴趣的现象的应用程序中。例如,当个体仅仅通过下载智能手机应用程序就可以加入参与式感知活动时,他们的可靠性可能是未知的。本文通过提供一种可扩展的方法来利用观察变量之间的依赖关系来提高事实发现的准确性,从而扩展了过去的社会感知文献。先前的工作假设报告的事实是独立的,或者当存在依赖关系时产生指数级的复杂性。相比之下,本文提出了第一种可伸缩的方法来容纳观察状态之间的依赖图。该方法使用飓风桑迪过后收集的真实数据进行测试,包括汽油、食物和医疗用品的可用性,以及广泛的模拟。评估表明,将预期的相关图(中断)与报告的未知可靠性观测相结合,可以从嘈杂的社会传感数据中更可靠地重建地面真相。我们还表明,当不同的假设与不同的相关模式相关联时,相关图可以帮助测试关于潜在原因的假设。例如,观察到的中断概况可以归因于供应商中断或过度的本地需求。两者在观察到的中断方面的预期相关性不同,从而可以联合识别实际中断及其潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing multi-hop calibration errors in large-scale mobile sensor networks FuzzyCAT: a novel procedure for refining the F-transform based sensor data compression CleanHands: an integrated monitoring system for control of hospital acquired infections A low-cost sensor platform for large-scale wideband spectrum monitoring Detecting malicious morphological alterations of ECG signals in body sensor networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1