Book Review: Matthew Levering, Engaging the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit: Love and Gift in the Trinity and the Church

Laurene Simms
{"title":"Book Review: Matthew Levering, Engaging the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit: Love and Gift in the Trinity and the Church","authors":"Laurene Simms","doi":"10.1177/10638512211028355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matthew Levering’s eloquent contribution to the study of pneumatology, Engaging the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit: Love and Gift in the Trinity and the Church, is a compelling defense of the proper names—Love and Gift—of the third Person of the Trinity. The principal aim of this volume is to counter all who question the scriptural and theological justification for applying these names to the Holy Spirit in the inner life of the Trinity as proper names, meaning that these two names distinguish the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son within the immanent Trinity. Levering presents three key arguments from those who take issue with attributing the names Love and Gift: some thinkers assume that these names for the Holy Spirit are only metaphorical, as does Jürgen Moltmann, or they agree with Sinclair Ferguson that the names are not biblically justified, or else they side with Steven Studebaker, who thinks the names Love and Gift indicate the passivity and subordination of the Holy Spirit to the Father and the Son. To refute such objections, Levering sets out to survey the landscape of contemporary pneumatology and to respond to the concerns presented by Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox theologians. In the end, Levering successfully demonstrates the perennial validity of the Augustinian and Thomistic doctrine that stands behind the proper names of Love and Gift. In Levering’s substantial introduction, he lays the foundation for defending the proper names of Love and Gift for the Holy Spirit. He does so by contrasting the Augustinian and Thomistic vision with three attempts in contemporary theology to explicate the theology of the Spirit—the accentuation of the role of the Holy Spirit, contextualization in postmodern trinitarian theology, and social trinitarianism—and the juxtaposition reveals the weaknesses of the modern approaches. Levering maintains that the Augustinian/Thomistic conception of the names Love and Gift, and the understanding of the subsisting relations in the Trinity that follows therefrom, offers a richer account than the 1028355 PRE0010.1177/10638512211028355Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2021","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512211028355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Matthew Levering’s eloquent contribution to the study of pneumatology, Engaging the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit: Love and Gift in the Trinity and the Church, is a compelling defense of the proper names—Love and Gift—of the third Person of the Trinity. The principal aim of this volume is to counter all who question the scriptural and theological justification for applying these names to the Holy Spirit in the inner life of the Trinity as proper names, meaning that these two names distinguish the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son within the immanent Trinity. Levering presents three key arguments from those who take issue with attributing the names Love and Gift: some thinkers assume that these names for the Holy Spirit are only metaphorical, as does Jürgen Moltmann, or they agree with Sinclair Ferguson that the names are not biblically justified, or else they side with Steven Studebaker, who thinks the names Love and Gift indicate the passivity and subordination of the Holy Spirit to the Father and the Son. To refute such objections, Levering sets out to survey the landscape of contemporary pneumatology and to respond to the concerns presented by Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox theologians. In the end, Levering successfully demonstrates the perennial validity of the Augustinian and Thomistic doctrine that stands behind the proper names of Love and Gift. In Levering’s substantial introduction, he lays the foundation for defending the proper names of Love and Gift for the Holy Spirit. He does so by contrasting the Augustinian and Thomistic vision with three attempts in contemporary theology to explicate the theology of the Spirit—the accentuation of the role of the Holy Spirit, contextualization in postmodern trinitarian theology, and social trinitarianism—and the juxtaposition reveals the weaknesses of the modern approaches. Levering maintains that the Augustinian/Thomistic conception of the names Love and Gift, and the understanding of the subsisting relations in the Trinity that follows therefrom, offers a richer account than the 1028355 PRE0010.1177/10638512211028355Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:马修·利弗林,《参与圣灵的教义:三位一体与教会中的爱与恩赐》
马修·利弗林对圣灵学研究的杰出贡献,《参与圣灵的教义:三位一体和教会中的爱与恩赐》,是对三位一体第三位格的恰当名称——爱与恩赐——的有力辩护。这本书的主要目的是反驳所有质疑圣经和神学的理由,将这些名称应用于圣灵在三位一体的内在生活作为专有名称,意思是这两个名称区分圣灵与圣父和圣子在内在的三位一体。利弗林提出了三个关键的论点,这些论点来自那些对“爱”和“礼物”这两个名字有争议的人:一些思想家认为这些圣灵的名字只是隐喻,就像j根·莫尔特曼一样,或者他们同意辛克莱·弗格森的观点,认为这些名字不符合圣经,或者他们站在史蒂文·斯图德贝克的立场上,他认为“爱”和“礼物”这两个名字表明了圣灵对圣父和圣子的被动和从属地位。为了反驳这些反对意见,利弗林着手调查当代气体学的现状,并回应天主教、新教和东正教神学家提出的担忧。最后,利弗林成功地证明了奥古斯丁和托马斯主义教义的永恒有效性,这些教义支持爱和礼物的专有名称。在利弗林的实质性介绍中,他为捍卫爱和圣灵的礼物的适当名称奠定了基础。他将奥古斯丁和托马斯的观点与当代神学解释圣灵神学的三种尝试——强调圣灵的作用,后现代三位一体神学的语境化,以及社会三位一体论——进行对比,并置揭示了现代方法的弱点。利弗林坚持认为,奥古斯丁/托马斯对爱和礼物的概念,以及对三位一体中存在关系的理解,提供了比1028355 PRE0010.1177/10638512211028355Pro Ecclesia:天主教和福音派神学杂志书评书评2021更丰富的描述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catholicity and the Catholic Church: Protestant Concerns and (Roman) Catholic Perspectives Supremely Simple Trinity and Contemporary “Natural Theology”: Bonaventure Beyond Jenson and Plotinus Editor’s Note The Grammar of Salvation: The Function of Trinitarian Theology in the Works of Karen Kilby and Robert Jenson Reasons to Say Farewell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1