Study of Distractors in Neural Models of Code

Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Aftab Hussain, Sahil Suneja, Mohammad Amin Alipour
{"title":"Study of Distractors in Neural Models of Code","authors":"Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Aftab Hussain, Sahil Suneja, Mohammad Amin Alipour","doi":"10.1109/InteNSE59150.2023.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding important features that contribute to the prediction of neural models is an active area of research in explainable AI. Neural models are opaque and finding such features sheds light on a better understanding of their predictions. In contrast, in this work, we present an inverse perspective of distractor features: features that cast doubt about the prediction by affecting the model's confidence in its prediction. Understanding distractors provide a complementary view of the features' relevance in the predictions of neural models. In this paper, we apply a reduction-based technique to find distractors and provide our preliminary results of their impacts and types. Our experiments across various tasks, models, and datasets of code reveal that the removal of tokens can have a significant impact on the confidence of models in their predictions and the categories of tokens can also play a vital role in the model's confidence. Our study aims to enhance the transparency of models by emphasizing those tokens that significantly influence the confidence of the models.","PeriodicalId":166762,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Interpretability and Robustness in Neural Software Engineering (InteNSE)","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Interpretability and Robustness in Neural Software Engineering (InteNSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/InteNSE59150.2023.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Finding important features that contribute to the prediction of neural models is an active area of research in explainable AI. Neural models are opaque and finding such features sheds light on a better understanding of their predictions. In contrast, in this work, we present an inverse perspective of distractor features: features that cast doubt about the prediction by affecting the model's confidence in its prediction. Understanding distractors provide a complementary view of the features' relevance in the predictions of neural models. In this paper, we apply a reduction-based technique to find distractors and provide our preliminary results of their impacts and types. Our experiments across various tasks, models, and datasets of code reveal that the removal of tokens can have a significant impact on the confidence of models in their predictions and the categories of tokens can also play a vital role in the model's confidence. Our study aims to enhance the transparency of models by emphasizing those tokens that significantly influence the confidence of the models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代码神经模型中干扰物的研究
寻找有助于神经模型预测的重要特征是可解释人工智能的一个活跃研究领域。神经模型是不透明的,找到这样的特征有助于更好地理解它们的预测。相比之下,在这项工作中,我们提出了干扰物特征的反向视角:通过影响模型对其预测的置信度而对预测产生怀疑的特征。理解干扰物为神经模型预测中特征的相关性提供了补充观点。在本文中,我们采用了一种基于约简的技术来寻找干扰物,并提供了它们的影响和类型的初步结果。我们对各种任务、模型和代码数据集的实验表明,删除令牌会对模型的预测置信度产生重大影响,令牌的类别也会在模型的置信度中发挥至关重要的作用。我们的研究旨在通过强调那些显著影响模型置信度的令牌来提高模型的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probing Numeracy and Logic of Language Models of Code A Study of Variable-Role-based Feature Enrichment in Neural Models of Code Study of Distractors in Neural Models of Code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1