SWOT and AHP Analysis in Determining the Strategy of Product Marketing Excellence in Companies

Arica Dwi Susanto, I. Apriyanto
{"title":"SWOT and AHP Analysis in Determining the Strategy of Product Marketing Excellence in Companies","authors":"Arica Dwi Susanto, I. Apriyanto","doi":"10.46300/91015.2020.14.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of companies in the digital era especially product business in Indonesia is now increasingly prominent in complexity, competition, change, and uncertainty so that the company's marketing and sales systems have not reached a maximal capacity due to the lack of superior and appropriate strategy. The researcher considered several alternatives using SWOT analysis and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to overcome these problems. The results showed that using the SWOT-AHP Analysis, it was found that the Strength parameter got the highest score by 53% and Opportunity parameter by 21%. Through the SWOT sub-criteria, it was found that the Strenghts priority were S2 (Registered patent) with a score of 0.53, S1 (New product) with a score of 0.29, S3 (Mechanical technology) with a score of 0.28, respectively. While weaknesses priority were W2 (inoptimal product promotion) with a score of 0.63, W1 (product not widely known) with a score of 0.37. In addition, the Opportunities Priority were the order of O2 (market share's openness) with a score of 0.52, O3 (More efficient products) with a score of 0.29, and O1 (Switching products from manual to automatic) with a score 0.19. And finally, the Threats priority were T1 (raw material) with a score of 0.53, T2 (price competition) with a score of 0.26 and T3 (product fraud) with a score of 0.21. The top priority of leading marketing strategy are by increasing product quality by 39.3%, while the second priority is marketing cooperation by 21.4%, the third is the pricing strategy by 20.5% and the last is promotion by 14.8%.","PeriodicalId":158702,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Systems Applications, Engineering & Development","volume":"250 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Systems Applications, Engineering & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46300/91015.2020.14.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of companies in the digital era especially product business in Indonesia is now increasingly prominent in complexity, competition, change, and uncertainty so that the company's marketing and sales systems have not reached a maximal capacity due to the lack of superior and appropriate strategy. The researcher considered several alternatives using SWOT analysis and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to overcome these problems. The results showed that using the SWOT-AHP Analysis, it was found that the Strength parameter got the highest score by 53% and Opportunity parameter by 21%. Through the SWOT sub-criteria, it was found that the Strenghts priority were S2 (Registered patent) with a score of 0.53, S1 (New product) with a score of 0.29, S3 (Mechanical technology) with a score of 0.28, respectively. While weaknesses priority were W2 (inoptimal product promotion) with a score of 0.63, W1 (product not widely known) with a score of 0.37. In addition, the Opportunities Priority were the order of O2 (market share's openness) with a score of 0.52, O3 (More efficient products) with a score of 0.29, and O1 (Switching products from manual to automatic) with a score 0.19. And finally, the Threats priority were T1 (raw material) with a score of 0.53, T2 (price competition) with a score of 0.26 and T3 (product fraud) with a score of 0.21. The top priority of leading marketing strategy are by increasing product quality by 39.3%, while the second priority is marketing cooperation by 21.4%, the third is the pricing strategy by 20.5% and the last is promotion by 14.8%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SWOT和AHP分析法在企业产品营销卓越战略确定中的应用
印尼数字化时代的企业发展,特别是产品业务的复杂性、竞争性、变化性和不确定性日益突出,导致公司的营销和销售系统由于缺乏优越和合适的战略而没有达到最大的能力。研究人员考虑了几种选择使用SWOT分析和层次分析法(AHP)方法来克服这些问题。结果表明,运用SWOT-AHP分析发现,实力参数得分最高,为53%,机会参数得分最高,为21%。通过SWOT子标准,发现优势优先级分别为:S2(注册专利)得分0.53,S1(新产品)得分0.29,S3(机械技术)得分0.28。劣势优先级为W2(产品推广不佳),得分为0.63,W1(产品不广为人知)得分为0.37。此外,机会优先级依次为O2(市场份额的开放性),得分为0.52,O3(更高效的产品)得分为0.29,O1(从手动转向自动的产品)得分为0.19。最后,威胁优先级依次为T1(原材料),得分为0.53;T2(价格竞争),得分为0.26;T3(产品欺诈),得分为0.21。最重要的营销策略是提高产品质量(39.3%),其次是营销合作(21.4%),第三是价格策略(20.5%),最后是促销(14.8%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ERP System Implementation: Benefits and Economic Effectiveness Economic Indicators Selection for Property Crime Rates using Grey Relational Analysis and Support Vector Regression Chaos Driven Evolutionary Algorithm: a Novel Approach for Optimization Design and Implementation of Digital Beam Former Architecture for Phased Array Radar A Simulation and Experimental Study on Identification of an Electromechanical System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1