{"title":"Requiem for a Rural Hinterland","authors":"Max Rousseau, Maryame Amarouche, Kawtar Salik","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.2026668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Morocco provides an interesting framework for re-examining planetary urbanisation in relation to planning policies, which shape spaces that were considered “rural” until now. In Morocco, a country deeply affected by metropolitanisation, the agricultural areas on the periphery of major cities are undergoing rapid economic, social and landscape transformations. City growth is silently disrupting ways of life and economic activities, as well as rural-based social organisations. These changes are critical because Morocco is a country where agriculture and, more generally, “rurality”, is still vitally important. This explains why the relations between the city and the country are deeply affected by the regime’s contradictory new policies. These include: a neoliberal approach, which is undermining the political order for the sake of accumulation, draining the countryside and pursuing urban sprawl; and an authoritarian approach that is designed to preserve the social and political order and involves keeping a tight rein on the rural community, which traditionally supported the regime. To explore these contradictions, we examine the periphery on the east of the Rabat-Salé-Témara region, where the control of urban sprawl provides a particularly interesting perspective when analysing how the authoritarian state has developed in a context of laissez-faire regulation. When urban sprawl interferes with the limits between town and country and fragments peri-urban “grey spaces”, it becomes the focus of bitter negotiation between public and private actors, between social groups and between use value (for the rural population) and exchange value (for state-supported urban investors). The first part examines the power relations between the main actors involved in the urbanisation of Rabat’s grey spaces. The second part explores their impact on rural and farming communities in three successive phases. The first phase examines the recomposition of the state, with the new city model, using the case of Tamesna. The second phase examines the recentralisation of public action to consolidate the metropolitan influence, which involves the agency responsible for developing the Bouregreg Valley in a municipality on the outskirts of Salé. Finally, the third phase focuses on the challenges of reconfiguring state policies in response to the changes caused by urban spread. Here, we examine the case of two rural municipalities in the second ring: Shoul and Sidi Yahya des Zaers.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.2026668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Morocco provides an interesting framework for re-examining planetary urbanisation in relation to planning policies, which shape spaces that were considered “rural” until now. In Morocco, a country deeply affected by metropolitanisation, the agricultural areas on the periphery of major cities are undergoing rapid economic, social and landscape transformations. City growth is silently disrupting ways of life and economic activities, as well as rural-based social organisations. These changes are critical because Morocco is a country where agriculture and, more generally, “rurality”, is still vitally important. This explains why the relations between the city and the country are deeply affected by the regime’s contradictory new policies. These include: a neoliberal approach, which is undermining the political order for the sake of accumulation, draining the countryside and pursuing urban sprawl; and an authoritarian approach that is designed to preserve the social and political order and involves keeping a tight rein on the rural community, which traditionally supported the regime. To explore these contradictions, we examine the periphery on the east of the Rabat-Salé-Témara region, where the control of urban sprawl provides a particularly interesting perspective when analysing how the authoritarian state has developed in a context of laissez-faire regulation. When urban sprawl interferes with the limits between town and country and fragments peri-urban “grey spaces”, it becomes the focus of bitter negotiation between public and private actors, between social groups and between use value (for the rural population) and exchange value (for state-supported urban investors). The first part examines the power relations between the main actors involved in the urbanisation of Rabat’s grey spaces. The second part explores their impact on rural and farming communities in three successive phases. The first phase examines the recomposition of the state, with the new city model, using the case of Tamesna. The second phase examines the recentralisation of public action to consolidate the metropolitan influence, which involves the agency responsible for developing the Bouregreg Valley in a municipality on the outskirts of Salé. Finally, the third phase focuses on the challenges of reconfiguring state policies in response to the changes caused by urban spread. Here, we examine the case of two rural municipalities in the second ring: Shoul and Sidi Yahya des Zaers.
摩洛哥为重新审视与规划政策相关的全球城市化提供了一个有趣的框架,这些政策塑造了迄今为止被认为是“农村”的空间。在摩洛哥这个深受都市化影响的国家,主要城市外围的农业区正在经历迅速的经济、社会和景观变化。城市的发展正在悄无声息地破坏着人们的生活方式和经济活动,以及以农村为基础的社会组织。这些变化是至关重要的,因为摩洛哥是一个农业,更普遍地说,“农村”仍然至关重要的国家。这就解释了为什么城市和乡村的关系深受政权矛盾的新政策的影响。其中包括:一种新自由主义的方法,这种方法正在为了积累而破坏政治秩序,耗尽农村资源,追求城市扩张;另一种是旨在维护社会和政治秩序的专制手段,包括严格控制传统上支持政权的农村社区。为了探索这些矛盾,我们考察了拉巴特-萨尔萨梅拉地区东部的边缘地区,在分析威权国家如何在自由放任的监管背景下发展时,对城市扩张的控制提供了一个特别有趣的视角。当城市扩张干扰了城镇和乡村之间的界限,分裂了城市周边的“灰色空间”时,它就成为公共和私人行为者之间、社会群体之间以及使用价值(针对农村人口)和交换价值(针对国家支持的城市投资者)之间激烈谈判的焦点。第一部分考察了拉巴特灰色空间城市化过程中主要参与者之间的权力关系。第二部分分三个阶段探讨了它们对农村和农业社区的影响。第一阶段以Tamesna为例,通过新的城市模型来考察该州的重组。第二阶段研究公共行动的重新集中,以巩固大都市的影响力,其中涉及负责开发sal郊区自治市Bouregreg山谷的机构。最后,第三阶段的重点是重新配置国家政策以应对城市扩张带来的变化所面临的挑战。在这里,我们研究了二环的两个农村城市:Shoul和Sidi Yahya des Zaers。