Application of microbiological assay to determine the potency of intravenous antibiotics

S. Nahar, M. S. Khatun, M. Kabir
{"title":"Application of microbiological assay to determine the potency of intravenous antibiotics","authors":"S. Nahar, M. S. Khatun, M. Kabir","doi":"10.3329/sjm.v10i1.50729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demonstration of equivalent amounts of active pharmaceutical ingredient is a basic requirement for intravenous generic drugs prior to administration. Physicochemical methods are often used to determine concentration of antibiotics in biological fluids. However, it does not permit direct quantification of potency of a desired antibiotic. This study demonstrates the application of a microbiological assay to determine the potency and concentration of commercially available pharmaceutical-grade antibiotics used for injections. Concentration-dependent variation of inhibitory effect of four commercial brands of cefuroxime and two of ciprofloxacin were observed against two reference bacteria (Escherichia coli DH5α and Escherichia coli ATCC 8739) on Mueller Hinton agar. Regression analysis was used to assess the in vitro equivalence of generic products sold by different retail companies in Dhaka city. A linear relationship was found between the concentration and response of the bacteria in regression analysis where anti-log of X-intercept and slope showed the concentration and potency, respectively. The study showed excellent results of linearity (r2≥0.89), precision (inter assay variation ≤10% for cefuroxime and ≤20% for ciprofloxacin), accuracy and specificity tests for both types of antibiotics. Pharmaceutical equivalence demonstrated by four cefuroxime and two ciprofloxacin samples showed no significantly distinguishable slopes (P > 0.78 and P > 0.44) and intercepts (P > 0.25 and P > 0.07), respectively. Estimated potency for cefuroxime was 91.1-100.0% and for ciprofloxacin was 68.1-100.0%. Microbiological assay was found to be convenient, rapid, cost-effective, precise and accurate in demonstrating pharmaceutical equivalence of antibiotics in different dosage forms. This technique can be used as an alternative method for testing generic antibiotics prior to their use in animal and human. \nStamford Journal of Microbiology, Vol.10 (1) 2020: 25-29","PeriodicalId":170445,"journal":{"name":"Stamford Journal of Microbiology","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stamford Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/sjm.v10i1.50729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Demonstration of equivalent amounts of active pharmaceutical ingredient is a basic requirement for intravenous generic drugs prior to administration. Physicochemical methods are often used to determine concentration of antibiotics in biological fluids. However, it does not permit direct quantification of potency of a desired antibiotic. This study demonstrates the application of a microbiological assay to determine the potency and concentration of commercially available pharmaceutical-grade antibiotics used for injections. Concentration-dependent variation of inhibitory effect of four commercial brands of cefuroxime and two of ciprofloxacin were observed against two reference bacteria (Escherichia coli DH5α and Escherichia coli ATCC 8739) on Mueller Hinton agar. Regression analysis was used to assess the in vitro equivalence of generic products sold by different retail companies in Dhaka city. A linear relationship was found between the concentration and response of the bacteria in regression analysis where anti-log of X-intercept and slope showed the concentration and potency, respectively. The study showed excellent results of linearity (r2≥0.89), precision (inter assay variation ≤10% for cefuroxime and ≤20% for ciprofloxacin), accuracy and specificity tests for both types of antibiotics. Pharmaceutical equivalence demonstrated by four cefuroxime and two ciprofloxacin samples showed no significantly distinguishable slopes (P > 0.78 and P > 0.44) and intercepts (P > 0.25 and P > 0.07), respectively. Estimated potency for cefuroxime was 91.1-100.0% and for ciprofloxacin was 68.1-100.0%. Microbiological assay was found to be convenient, rapid, cost-effective, precise and accurate in demonstrating pharmaceutical equivalence of antibiotics in different dosage forms. This technique can be used as an alternative method for testing generic antibiotics prior to their use in animal and human. Stamford Journal of Microbiology, Vol.10 (1) 2020: 25-29
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物测定法测定静脉注射抗生素效价的应用
静脉注射仿制药给药前必须证明其活性成分的等量。物理化学方法常用于测定生物体液中抗生素的浓度。然而,它不允许直接定量所需要的抗生素的效力。本研究演示了微生物测定法的应用,以确定市售药物级注射用抗生素的效力和浓度。观察了4个市售品牌头孢呋辛和2个环丙沙星对两种对照菌(大肠杆菌DH5α和ATCC 8739)在Mueller Hinton琼脂上抑制效果的浓度依赖性变化。采用回归分析对达卡市不同零售公司销售的仿制药进行体外等效性评价。回归分析结果表明,细菌的浓度与反应呈线性关系,其中x截距和斜率的反对数分别为浓度和效价。研究结果表明,两种抗生素的线性度(r2≥0.89)、精密度(头孢呋辛的测定间变异≤10%,环丙沙星的测定间变异≤20%)、准确度和特异性均具有良好的结果。四种头孢呋辛和两种环丙沙星样品的药物等效性显示,斜率(P > 0.78和P > 0.44)和截距(P > 0.25和P > 0.07)分别无显著差异。头孢呋辛的效价为91.1 ~ 100.0%,环丙沙星的效价为68.1 ~ 100.0%。结果表明,微生物测定法简便、快速、经济、准确、准确地证明了不同剂型抗生素的药物等效性。该技术可作为非专利抗生素在动物和人类使用之前进行检测的替代方法。微生物学报,Vol.10 (1) 2020: 25-29
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria In Fish Sold In Local Market In Dhaka City Isolation of Indigenous Bacillus Spp. From Garden Soil To Decolorize Synthetic Textile Dyes Antibiogram Profiling of Clinical Isolates From Several Renowned Diagnostic Centers In Dhaka City, Bangladesh Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (Apdt), An Approach To Fightback Against Antibiotic Resistance: A Short Review Mitigation of Heavy Metal Pollution-An Overview Of Microbial Remediation And Prospect In Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1