The Evolution of Lean Construction Education (Part 1 of 2): At US-Based Universities

Zofia K. Rybkowski, Lincoln H. Forbes, C. Tsao
{"title":"The Evolution of Lean Construction Education (Part 1 of 2): At US-Based Universities","authors":"Zofia K. Rybkowski, Lincoln H. Forbes, C. Tsao","doi":"10.24928/2018/0447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effectively transferring lean knowledge and skills to owners, architects, engineers, and constructors (OAEC) requires behavioral changes within an industry that has been legitimately criticized for entrenched practices and low productivity. Documenting how successful that knowledge transfer is taking place can be helpful to those wishing to efficiently introduce lean into their own OAEC organizations. Lean educational efforts within academic settings have been brought to light through earlier publications. This research identifies the content of lean construction courses from five US-based universities to add to the seven previously documented. Tabulated results revealed that: (a) the content of lean curricula is evolving as grading formats, types of readings, and numbers and types of simulations have grown; and (b) lean curricula as defined by the Associated General Contractors (AGC) lean certification program is starting to permeate academic coursework. This may be a testament that AGC lean certification is providing some advantage in career placement for students. Investigation of the evolution of lean education within academia helps us better understand a driver of change as students enter the OAEC industry following graduation. The intent of this paper is to document this moment in time, as well as to raise a question about the potential impact of curriculum standardization on future continuous improvement initiatives with respect to lean construction philosophy, methods, and tools, in the OAEC industry.","PeriodicalId":419313,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","volume":"13 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Effectively transferring lean knowledge and skills to owners, architects, engineers, and constructors (OAEC) requires behavioral changes within an industry that has been legitimately criticized for entrenched practices and low productivity. Documenting how successful that knowledge transfer is taking place can be helpful to those wishing to efficiently introduce lean into their own OAEC organizations. Lean educational efforts within academic settings have been brought to light through earlier publications. This research identifies the content of lean construction courses from five US-based universities to add to the seven previously documented. Tabulated results revealed that: (a) the content of lean curricula is evolving as grading formats, types of readings, and numbers and types of simulations have grown; and (b) lean curricula as defined by the Associated General Contractors (AGC) lean certification program is starting to permeate academic coursework. This may be a testament that AGC lean certification is providing some advantage in career placement for students. Investigation of the evolution of lean education within academia helps us better understand a driver of change as students enter the OAEC industry following graduation. The intent of this paper is to document this moment in time, as well as to raise a question about the potential impact of curriculum standardization on future continuous improvement initiatives with respect to lean construction philosophy, methods, and tools, in the OAEC industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精益建设教育的演变(1 / 2):在美国大学
将精益知识和技能有效地传递给业主、建筑师、工程师和建造者(OAEC),需要行业内的行为改变,这个行业因根深蒂固的做法和低生产率而受到合理的批评。记录知识转移是如何成功进行的,对于那些希望有效地将精益引入他们自己的OAEC组织的人是有帮助的。通过早期的出版物,学术环境中的精益教育工作已被曝光。本研究确定了五所美国大学的精益建设课程的内容,以增加先前记录的七所大学的内容。表格结果显示:(a)精简课程的内容随着评分格式、阅读材料类型以及模拟的数量和类型的增加而不断演变;(b)由联合总承包商(AGC)精益认证计划定义的精益课程开始渗透到学术课程中。这可能是AGC精益认证为学生提供就业优势的一个证明。对学术界精益教育演变的调查有助于我们更好地理解学生毕业后进入OAEC行业的变革驱动因素。本文的目的是记录这一时刻,以及提出一个关于课程标准化对OAEC行业中关于精益建设理念、方法和工具的未来持续改进计划的潜在影响的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Labour Productivity in Petrochemical Construction and Maintenance Projects Complex Production Systems: Non-Linear and Non-Repetitive Projects Towards Facility Management Participation in Design: A UCSF Case Study Project Delivery Through Lean Principles Across All Disciplnes of Construction in a Developing Country Environment Short Takt Time in Construction – a Practical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1