Entrepreneurship and Regional Growth Regimes in the United States

J. Appert, Ege Can, Frank M. Fossen
{"title":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Growth Regimes in the United States","authors":"J. Appert, Ege Can, Frank M. Fossen","doi":"10.33141/PO.2021.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate \nregional growth regimes in the US states from 1980 to 2014. Based on start-up \nrates and employment growth as suggested by Audretsch and Fritsch (2002), we \nclassify states into routinized, entrepreneurial, revolving door, and \ndownsizing regimes. The results indicate that there was no significant \nassociation between start-up rates and employment growth in the 1980s, but a \npositive relationship in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. Further, we document that \nthe entrepreneurial and the downsizing regimes are attractor regimes that tend \nto stick, whereas the routinized and revolving door regimes are transitionary \nregimes. Importantly, states in the routinized regime predominantly move to the \ndownsizing regime, suggesting that an over-reliance on established companies \nrelative to start-ups in the state may threaten employment growth in the long \nrun.","PeriodicalId":337871,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Organizacji","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Organizacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33141/PO.2021.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We investigate regional growth regimes in the US states from 1980 to 2014. Based on start-up rates and employment growth as suggested by Audretsch and Fritsch (2002), we classify states into routinized, entrepreneurial, revolving door, and downsizing regimes. The results indicate that there was no significant association between start-up rates and employment growth in the 1980s, but a positive relationship in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. Further, we document that the entrepreneurial and the downsizing regimes are attractor regimes that tend to stick, whereas the routinized and revolving door regimes are transitionary regimes. Importantly, states in the routinized regime predominantly move to the downsizing regime, suggesting that an over-reliance on established companies relative to start-ups in the state may threaten employment growth in the long run.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的企业家精神和区域增长机制
我们研究了1980年至2014年美国各州的区域增长机制。根据Audretsch和Fritsch(2002)提出的创业率和就业增长,我们将国家分为常规化、创业化、旋转门和缩小规模制度。结果表明,20世纪80年代创业率与就业增长之间不存在显著相关关系,但在20世纪90年代、21世纪初和2010年代存在正相关关系。此外,我们证明了创业型和精简型制度是倾向于坚持下去的吸引型制度,而常规化和旋转门制度是过渡型制度。重要的是,在常规制度下的州主要转向缩小规模制度,这表明,相对于该州的初创企业,过度依赖老牌企业可能会威胁到长期的就业增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Sustainable Human Resources Management and Employee Engagement in Creative Professions on the Example of Architects Dojrzałość procesowa producentów oraz dystrybutorów energii elektrycznej i ciepła systemowego w Polsce Badania dotyczące robotyzacji procesów biznesowych w naukach o zarządzaniu – systematyczny przegląd literatury Pokolenie Z – perspektywa zaufania do przełożonych i współpracowników Transferable Competencies or Transferability of Competencies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1