A simple model explaining the interaction between special interest spending and voter choices

A. Murphy
{"title":"A simple model explaining the interaction between special interest spending and voter choices","authors":"A. Murphy","doi":"10.1453/JEPE.V6I3.1920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This research develops a model of eligible voters rationally maximizing their stochastic utility functions in their decisions with respect to casting ballots in elections that result in voting decision being largely determined by social and psychological factors heterogeneously maleable by political expenditures. The wealthiest agents utilize their overwhelming financial resources to promote only candidates cooperating with their special interests to attract public attention, which exerts social pressure on voters to cast ballots only for those politicians who represent those agents. The model, which enables exacting computation of the benefits to politicians, special interest groups, and voters from their political actions, is shown to supply insightful explanations for the 2016 U.S. Presidential polling results for the four leading candidates. Voters were effectively swayed by large political expenditures to select from the two candidates who represented the agents providing the financial backing to market their special interests. Keywords. Special interests, Voter utility, Elections, Political marketing. JEL. D71, D72, F50.","PeriodicalId":432468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEPE.V6I3.1920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. This research develops a model of eligible voters rationally maximizing their stochastic utility functions in their decisions with respect to casting ballots in elections that result in voting decision being largely determined by social and psychological factors heterogeneously maleable by political expenditures. The wealthiest agents utilize their overwhelming financial resources to promote only candidates cooperating with their special interests to attract public attention, which exerts social pressure on voters to cast ballots only for those politicians who represent those agents. The model, which enables exacting computation of the benefits to politicians, special interest groups, and voters from their political actions, is shown to supply insightful explanations for the 2016 U.S. Presidential polling results for the four leading candidates. Voters were effectively swayed by large political expenditures to select from the two candidates who represented the agents providing the financial backing to market their special interests. Keywords. Special interests, Voter utility, Elections, Political marketing. JEL. D71, D72, F50.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个解释特殊利益支出和选民选择之间相互作用的简单模型
摘要本研究建立了一个合格选民在选举投票决策中理性最大化其随机效用函数的模型,该模型导致投票决策在很大程度上由社会和心理因素决定,并受到政治支出的异质影响。最富有的代理人利用其压倒性的财政资源,只支持与他们的特殊利益合作的候选人,以吸引公众的注意,这对选民施加了社会压力,使他们只把票投给代表这些代理人的政治家。该模型可以精确计算政治家、特殊利益集团和选民从他们的政治行为中获得的利益,并为2016年美国总统大选的4位主要候选人的投票结果提供了深刻的解释。选民们实际上受到巨额政治支出的影响,从两位候选人中做出选择,这两位候选人代表了为推销自己的特殊利益提供财政支持的代理人。关键词。特殊利益,选民效用,选举,政治营销。冻胶。D71, d72, f50。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The determinants of the intermediate products export: The case of Switzerland Bank credit and transmission mechanisms of monetary policy in Uganda The contribution of human capital to the economic development of Cameroon, 1980-2018 Are they willing to participate? A review on behavioral economics approach to voters turnout Financialization and political economy of financial regulation in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1