Mentoring Guides for U.S. College Faculty and Administrators in Culturally Diverse Settings

Ngozi Caleb Kamalu, Johnson A. Kamalu
{"title":"Mentoring Guides for U.S. College Faculty and Administrators in Culturally Diverse Settings","authors":"Ngozi Caleb Kamalu, Johnson A. Kamalu","doi":"10.47752/sjss.44.106.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to provide answers to the following research questions: Is effective mentoring a function of culture, learning or hereditary, birth/ nature? Or are people born with certain traits that make them more effective or better mentors than others or is it based on learning or socialization/ nurture?; Is cross gender or cross-racial more effective than mentoring based on demographic similarities characteristics? Are there some types or techniques or practices of mentoring that are more appropriate or more suitable to some demographic groups or populations – women, blacks and other racial minorities etc. than others? This paper defines mentoring, discusses competing schools/ theories of mentorship, as well as typologies of mentoring approaches. The paper concludes that multiple/ group mentoring approach is indicative of the new trend in the business; and that while each mentoring technique or model supplements or complements the other, multiple mentoring styles or systems tend to present the best possible path to achieving efficiency and effectiveness. Finally, it recommends appropriate mentoring strategies and techniques to improve mentoring that include programs that take into account demographic similarities between mentors and protégés, gender and race-based norms, stereotypes and discrimination, as well as cultural diversity.","PeriodicalId":149636,"journal":{"name":"Sumerianz Journal of Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sumerianz Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47752/sjss.44.106.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide answers to the following research questions: Is effective mentoring a function of culture, learning or hereditary, birth/ nature? Or are people born with certain traits that make them more effective or better mentors than others or is it based on learning or socialization/ nurture?; Is cross gender or cross-racial more effective than mentoring based on demographic similarities characteristics? Are there some types or techniques or practices of mentoring that are more appropriate or more suitable to some demographic groups or populations – women, blacks and other racial minorities etc. than others? This paper defines mentoring, discusses competing schools/ theories of mentorship, as well as typologies of mentoring approaches. The paper concludes that multiple/ group mentoring approach is indicative of the new trend in the business; and that while each mentoring technique or model supplements or complements the other, multiple mentoring styles or systems tend to present the best possible path to achieving efficiency and effectiveness. Finally, it recommends appropriate mentoring strategies and techniques to improve mentoring that include programs that take into account demographic similarities between mentors and protégés, gender and race-based norms, stereotypes and discrimination, as well as cultural diversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国大学教师和管理人员在多元文化背景下的指导指南
本文的目的是为以下研究问题提供答案:有效的指导是文化,学习或遗传,出生/自然的功能?或者人们天生就具有某些特征,使他们比其他人更有效或更好的导师,或者这是基于学习或社会化/培养?跨性别或跨种族的指导是否比基于人口统计学相似性特征的指导更有效?是否有一些类型或技术或指导实践更适合或更适合某些人口群体或人群-妇女,黑人和其他少数民族等?本文定义了指导,讨论了指导的竞争学派/理论,以及指导方法的类型。本文的结论是:多/群师徒模式是企业发展的新趋势;而且,当每种指导技术或模型相互补充或补充时,多种指导风格或系统倾向于呈现实现效率和有效性的最佳可能路径。最后,它推荐了适当的指导策略和技术,以改善指导,包括考虑到导师和原 个体之间的人口相似性、基于性别和种族的规范、刻板印象和歧视以及文化多样性的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Information and Communication Technology on Curriculum Delivery in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria Hotel Preferences of Customers in the Lens of Fear of Covid-19 The Generating Principle of “Symbolic Language” in the Book of Changes The Role of Electronic Applications in Transitioning and Developing the Performance of Digital Government Services: Tawakkalna Application for Covid-19 in Saudi Arabia Binge Drinking Among College Students: Trends, Consequences and Possible Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1