The Form of Paradox as the Paradox of Form: Beethoven’s “Tempest,” Schlegel’s Critique, and the Production of Absence

Edgardo Salinas
{"title":"The Form of Paradox as the Paradox of Form: Beethoven’s “Tempest,” Schlegel’s Critique, and the Production of Absence","authors":"Edgardo Salinas","doi":"10.1525/JM.2016.33.4.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written in 1802, Beethoven’s “Tempest” piano sonata is the iconic work of the “wirklich ganz neue Manier” the composer announced right after his traumatic seclusion in Heiligenstadt. Suffused with asymmetries and contradictions, the sonata’s first movement has long attracted the attention of scholars concerned with the epistemic soundness of sonata form theories. Most conspicuously, the absence in the recapitulation of what seems to be on first hearing the main theme generates a formal paradox that challenges the theoretical models devised to analyze sonata forms. This article reinterprets that paradox through the prism of Friedrich Schlegel’s theory of form, formulated in his critique of modern art and literature. In doing so, it recasts Beethoven’s “Tempest” sonata and Schlegel’s theory in the light of what I call the paradox of mediated immediacy. It further suggests a genealogical homology between the novel and sonata form to advance a historicized model of musical form that contemplates the material conditions accompanying the consolidation of print culture around 1800. Situated in this context, the “Tempest” sonata serves as a case study for exploring how Beethoven’s reinvention of the piano sonata reconfigured the interface between form and medium, deploying self-referential strategies that both rendered apparent and resignified the mediations entailed by the compositional practices instituted with the classical style. As a result, Beethoven’s piano sonatas came to operate as technologies of the self that became integral to the fashioning of romantic subjectivities. My reading emphasizes the aural experience induced by the form’s asymmetries, and contends that the absence delivered at its structural crux complicates sonata form practices to afford an experience of immediacy that captures in the medium of piano music the paradoxical condition Schlegel reckoned immanent to the modern self.","PeriodicalId":413730,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Musicology","volume":"317 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2016.33.4.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Written in 1802, Beethoven’s “Tempest” piano sonata is the iconic work of the “wirklich ganz neue Manier” the composer announced right after his traumatic seclusion in Heiligenstadt. Suffused with asymmetries and contradictions, the sonata’s first movement has long attracted the attention of scholars concerned with the epistemic soundness of sonata form theories. Most conspicuously, the absence in the recapitulation of what seems to be on first hearing the main theme generates a formal paradox that challenges the theoretical models devised to analyze sonata forms. This article reinterprets that paradox through the prism of Friedrich Schlegel’s theory of form, formulated in his critique of modern art and literature. In doing so, it recasts Beethoven’s “Tempest” sonata and Schlegel’s theory in the light of what I call the paradox of mediated immediacy. It further suggests a genealogical homology between the novel and sonata form to advance a historicized model of musical form that contemplates the material conditions accompanying the consolidation of print culture around 1800. Situated in this context, the “Tempest” sonata serves as a case study for exploring how Beethoven’s reinvention of the piano sonata reconfigured the interface between form and medium, deploying self-referential strategies that both rendered apparent and resignified the mediations entailed by the compositional practices instituted with the classical style. As a result, Beethoven’s piano sonatas came to operate as technologies of the self that became integral to the fashioning of romantic subjectivities. My reading emphasizes the aural experience induced by the form’s asymmetries, and contends that the absence delivered at its structural crux complicates sonata form practices to afford an experience of immediacy that captures in the medium of piano music the paradoxical condition Schlegel reckoned immanent to the modern self.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悖论的形式作为形式的悖论:贝多芬的《暴风雨》、施莱格尔的《批判》与缺席的产生
贝多芬的钢琴奏鸣曲《暴风雨》创作于1802年,是贝多芬在海利根施塔特(Heiligenstadt)遭受创伤后宣布的“新曼尼耶(wirklich ganz neue Manier)”的标志性作品。奏鸣曲的第一乐章充满了不对称和矛盾,长期以来一直吸引着关注奏鸣曲曲式理论认识论合理性的学者的关注。最明显的是,在第一次听到主题时似乎没有重述,这产生了一种形式上的悖论,挑战了分析奏鸣曲形式的理论模型。本文通过弗里德里希·施莱格尔(Friedrich Schlegel)在他对现代艺术和文学的批判中阐述的形式理论的棱镜,重新解释了这一悖论。在这样做的过程中,它重新诠释了贝多芬的“暴风雨”奏鸣曲和施莱格尔的理论,我称之为中介直接性的悖论。它进一步提出了小说和奏鸣曲形式之间的系谱同源性,以推进音乐形式的历史化模型,该模型考虑了1800年左右印刷文化巩固的物质条件。在这种背景下,“暴风雨”奏鸣曲作为一个案例研究,探索贝多芬对钢琴奏鸣曲的重新发明如何重新配置形式与媒介之间的界面,采用自我参照的策略,既表现出明显的,又重新定义了古典风格作曲实践所需要的调解。因此,贝多芬的钢琴奏鸣曲开始作为自我的技术来运作,成为塑造浪漫主体性不可或缺的一部分。我的阅读强调由形式的不对称引起的听觉体验,并认为在其结构关键处传递的缺失使奏鸣曲形式实践复杂化,以提供一种直接的体验,这种体验在钢琴音乐的媒介中捕捉到了施莱格尔认为是现代自我内在的矛盾条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Powerful Sounds for Troubled Times Extreme Vocality and the Boundaries of Song in the Medieval Crusades Musical Sociability, Atlantic Slavery, and the Portraiture of Carmontelle The “Economy of Incarnation” and the Cherubic Hymn in Nineteenth-Century Russia Séances, “Sperrits,” and Self-Playing Accordions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1