PORODIČNI FIDEIKOMIS U RIMSKOM PRAVU I NEKIM EVROPSKIM KODIFIKACIJAMA

Emilija Stanković
{"title":"PORODIČNI FIDEIKOMIS U RIMSKOM PRAVU I NEKIM EVROPSKIM KODIFIKACIJAMA","authors":"Emilija Stanković","doi":"10.46793/gp.0902.109s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Originally, fideicommissum represented the wish of the testator related to, for example, the place of burial, or the wish related to concluding marriage, etc. Such wishes in those times were not legally binding, but rather created moral obligation for the persons to whom they were directed to execute them. It was a wish, or a request made by the testator to be fulfilled by the persons who inherited his estate. Later on, it was Augustus who instituted fideicommissum as legally binding by favouring it in particular cases related to property rights. Fideicommissum was very similar to one other institution which also originated from Roman law, the legate. However, this institution exclusively referred to property, which was not the case with fideicommissum. These distinctions were lost in Justinian's Code where they became synonyms. In postclassical law, another institution emerged, called family fideicommissum (fideicommissum familiae relictum), which made family property inalianable. Thus, this fideicommissum ordered that family property be inherited by the eldest son (primogenitura), or the youngest son (ultimogenetura). This institution was fully applied in the Middle Ages becoming the basis of the social order of those times. It was abolished by bourgeois revolution and was not accepted later on in modern legislations. Fideicommissum was the part of Austrian Civil Code, as well as Serbian Civil Code which originated from it.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"64 S12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.0902.109s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Originally, fideicommissum represented the wish of the testator related to, for example, the place of burial, or the wish related to concluding marriage, etc. Such wishes in those times were not legally binding, but rather created moral obligation for the persons to whom they were directed to execute them. It was a wish, or a request made by the testator to be fulfilled by the persons who inherited his estate. Later on, it was Augustus who instituted fideicommissum as legally binding by favouring it in particular cases related to property rights. Fideicommissum was very similar to one other institution which also originated from Roman law, the legate. However, this institution exclusively referred to property, which was not the case with fideicommissum. These distinctions were lost in Justinian's Code where they became synonyms. In postclassical law, another institution emerged, called family fideicommissum (fideicommissum familiae relictum), which made family property inalianable. Thus, this fideicommissum ordered that family property be inherited by the eldest son (primogenitura), or the youngest son (ultimogenetura). This institution was fully applied in the Middle Ages becoming the basis of the social order of those times. It was abolished by bourgeois revolution and was not accepted later on in modern legislations. Fideicommissum was the part of Austrian Civil Code, as well as Serbian Civil Code which originated from it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最初,fideicommissum代表遗嘱人的愿望,例如,与埋葬地点有关的愿望,或与缔结婚姻有关的愿望等。在那个时代,这样的愿望没有法律约束力,而是为那些被指示执行这些愿望的人创造了道德义务。这是遗嘱人提出的愿望或请求,由继承其遗产的人来履行。后来,奥古斯都在与产权有关的特殊情况下,通过支持这种做法,制定了具有法律约束力的诚信原则。fiddeicommissum与另一种制度非常相似,它也起源于罗马法,即公使。然而,这一制度只涉及财产,而fideicommissum则不是这样。这些区别在查士丁尼法典中消失了,它们成了同义词。在后古典法中,出现了另一种制度,称为家庭财产不可分割(fideicommissum familiae relictum),它使家庭财产不可分割。因此,这一法律规定家庭财产由长子(primogentura)或小儿子(ultimogentura)继承。这一制度在中世纪得到充分应用,成为当时社会秩序的基础。它在资产阶级革命中被废除,后来在现代立法中没有被接受。诚信是奥地利民法典的一部分,塞尔维亚民法典也起源于此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO: LEGE LATA AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS NABAVLjANjE, DRŽANjE I NOŠENjE ORUŽJA PO ZAKONU O ORUŽJU I MUNICIJI U REPUBLICI SRBIJI LJUDSKA PRAVA NA RADNOM MJESTU – PRAVO NA PRIVATNOST VIŠESTRUKI POVRAT U POZITIVNOM KRIVIČNOM ZAKONODAVSTVU PRAVNA DRŽAVA I MEDIJI – KANONI MEDIJSKOG PRAVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1