Analysis Of Critical Thinking Ability Physics Education Students to Solve Geometrical Optics Problems

Sarah Octaviana, A. Hamid, E. Kasli
{"title":"Analysis Of Critical Thinking Ability Physics Education Students to Solve Geometrical Optics Problems","authors":"Sarah Octaviana, A. Hamid, E. Kasli","doi":"10.24815/AJSE.V2I2.17184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted aiming to determine the critical thinking skills of Teacher Training and Education Department Syiah Kuala University physics students based on critical thinking indicators in solving optical geometry problems. This research uses a quantitative approach with descriptive research methods. The population of this research is the 2016 Physics Education students as many as 57 students with 40 students as a sample of respondents. Data collection was performed using a test consisting of 5 essay questions that have been validated for use as an instrument for critical thinking tests. The data obtained is then averaged per indicator and then presented and then categorized using the criteria table for critical thinking skills. The results show the average percentage of values obtained by students in solving optical geometry problems for each critical thinking ability is 43% in the ability to provide an explanation simple, 33% in the ability to build basic skills, 25% in the ability to conclude, 33% in the ability to provide further explanation, and 13% in the ability to formulate strategies and tactics. Based on these results it can be concluded that the critical thinking ability of students based on each indicator in the physics education student at Teacher Training and Education Department Syiah Kuala University is still low.","PeriodicalId":138020,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Science Education","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/AJSE.V2I2.17184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was conducted aiming to determine the critical thinking skills of Teacher Training and Education Department Syiah Kuala University physics students based on critical thinking indicators in solving optical geometry problems. This research uses a quantitative approach with descriptive research methods. The population of this research is the 2016 Physics Education students as many as 57 students with 40 students as a sample of respondents. Data collection was performed using a test consisting of 5 essay questions that have been validated for use as an instrument for critical thinking tests. The data obtained is then averaged per indicator and then presented and then categorized using the criteria table for critical thinking skills. The results show the average percentage of values obtained by students in solving optical geometry problems for each critical thinking ability is 43% in the ability to provide an explanation simple, 33% in the ability to build basic skills, 25% in the ability to conclude, 33% in the ability to provide further explanation, and 13% in the ability to formulate strategies and tactics. Based on these results it can be concluded that the critical thinking ability of students based on each indicator in the physics education student at Teacher Training and Education Department Syiah Kuala University is still low.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理教育学生解决几何光学问题的批判性思维能力分析
本研究旨在以批判性思维指标为基础,评估马来西亚大学教师培训与教育系物理系学生在解决光学几何问题时的批判性思维能力。本研究采用定量方法和描述性研究方法。本研究的人口是2016年物理系学生多达57名,其中40名学生作为样本的受访者。数据收集使用由5个论文问题组成的测试进行,这些问题已被验证可作为批判性思维测试的工具。然后将获得的数据按每个指标取平均值,然后使用批判性思维技能的标准表进行呈现和分类。结果显示,学生在解决光学几何问题的每一项批判性思维能力中,提供简单解释的能力占43%,构建基本技能的能力占33%,结论能力占25%,提供进一步解释的能力占33%,制定战略和战术的能力占13%。综上所述,西雅瓜拉大学教师培训与教育系物理系学生在各指标上的批判性思维能力仍然较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Student Worksheets Based Inquiry using PhET Simulations to Enhance the Curiosity Attitude of High School Students Analysis of Sciences Process Skills of Science Education Students in Microbiology Practice The Development of Science Teaching Materials Based on Android Mobile to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in Junior High School Students Development of a Laboratory-based Physics Module with a Science Process Skills Approach to enhance the interest of High School Students PhET’s Photoelectric Effect Simulation: Experiments and Analysis for Classroom Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1