Pre-Press The Writer as a Patient with a Brain Tumour

S. Pereyra
{"title":"Pre-Press The Writer as a Patient with a Brain Tumour","authors":"S. Pereyra","doi":"10.7146/TFSS.V16I31.115101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article main concern is how professional authors and intellectuals develop illness narratives addressing the experience of having a brain tumour, and how this condition resorts to specific narratological features. Unlike pathographies written by laypersons, autobiographical accounts of illness developed by writers, and intellectuals create a narrative subjectivity that is specifically linked to their professional status rather than to their patient status which is simultaneous with the narrative time. In this article, we analyse two autobiographical novels, addressing the experiences of two European authors and intellectuals suffering from a brain tumour: A Journey Round My Skull (1939[1937]) by Frigyes Karinthy and Until Further Notice, I Am Alive (2012) by Tom Lubbock. These narratives on illness processes related to brain tumours are a place where writers resist the main symptoms and outcomes of this specific disease that, while affecting their cognitive capacities, seem to deprive them of their self-image as writers. Hence, these writings are based on the realignment of their past and present identities (Rimmon-Kenan, 2002: 15-18) always in connection with their images as authors. The comparative analysis presented here is intended as a contribution from the field of literary studies to the understanding of subjectivity in patients, whose narratives are not written to seek cure or to search for a cause or meaning for the disease, but to fight the loss of the writer-patient creative identity and ‘ipseity’ (Derrida, 2009).","PeriodicalId":110718,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/TFSS.V16I31.115101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article main concern is how professional authors and intellectuals develop illness narratives addressing the experience of having a brain tumour, and how this condition resorts to specific narratological features. Unlike pathographies written by laypersons, autobiographical accounts of illness developed by writers, and intellectuals create a narrative subjectivity that is specifically linked to their professional status rather than to their patient status which is simultaneous with the narrative time. In this article, we analyse two autobiographical novels, addressing the experiences of two European authors and intellectuals suffering from a brain tumour: A Journey Round My Skull (1939[1937]) by Frigyes Karinthy and Until Further Notice, I Am Alive (2012) by Tom Lubbock. These narratives on illness processes related to brain tumours are a place where writers resist the main symptoms and outcomes of this specific disease that, while affecting their cognitive capacities, seem to deprive them of their self-image as writers. Hence, these writings are based on the realignment of their past and present identities (Rimmon-Kenan, 2002: 15-18) always in connection with their images as authors. The comparative analysis presented here is intended as a contribution from the field of literary studies to the understanding of subjectivity in patients, whose narratives are not written to seek cure or to search for a cause or meaning for the disease, but to fight the loss of the writer-patient creative identity and ‘ipseity’ (Derrida, 2009).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印前:作为脑瘤患者的作家
本文主要关注的是专业作家和知识分子如何发展疾病叙事,以解决患有脑肿瘤的经历,以及这种情况如何诉诸特定的叙事特征。与外行写的病理学不同,作家和知识分子对疾病的自传体描述创造了一种叙事主观性,这种主观性与他们的职业地位密切相关,而不是与叙事时间同步的患者地位。在本文中,我们分析了两部自传体小说,讲述了两位患有脑瘤的欧洲作家和知识分子的经历:弗里格斯·卡琳蒂的《我的头骨之旅》(1939[1937])和汤姆·拉伯克的《直到另行通知,我还活着》(2012)。在这些与脑肿瘤有关的疾病过程的叙述中,作者抵制了这种特殊疾病的主要症状和结果,这种疾病在影响他们的认知能力的同时,似乎剥夺了他们作为作家的自我形象。因此,这些作品是基于他们过去和现在身份的重新调整(Rimmon-Kenan, 2002: 15-18),总是与他们作为作者的形象联系在一起。这里提出的比较分析旨在作为文学研究领域对理解患者主体性的贡献,患者的叙述不是为了寻求治疗或寻找疾病的原因或意义,而是为了对抗作家-患者创造性身份和“迟钝”的丧失(德里达,2009)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring, describing, and mapping the constitutive elements of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in clinical practice Ansvarshierarki i lægemiddelomsorgen på plejehjem Global sundhed i dansk perspektiv Eksistentiel og åndelig omsorg i post-sekulære kontekster Undgå at digitale PRO-skemaer bidrager til ulighed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1