Açıklanamayan İnfertilitede IUI Tedavisinde GND ve Klomifen Sitrat İle Ovulasyon İndüksiyonu İle Gelişen Preovulatuar Folikül Sayısının Gebelik Oranlarına Etkisi

Mohammad İbrahim Hali̇lzade, Serkan Kahyaoğlu, İnci Hali̇lzade, A. Fi̇li̇z, Meryem KURU PEKCAN, Gülnur Özakşi̇t
{"title":"Açıklanamayan İnfertilitede IUI Tedavisinde GND ve Klomifen Sitrat İle Ovulasyon İndüksiyonu İle Gelişen Preovulatuar Folikül Sayısının Gebelik Oranlarına Etkisi","authors":"Mohammad İbrahim Hali̇lzade, Serkan Kahyaoğlu, İnci Hali̇lzade, A. Fi̇li̇z, Meryem KURU PEKCAN, Gülnur Özakşi̇t","doi":"10.38136/jgon.1307300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the number of dominant follicles formed in IUI with ovarian stimulation (OS) affects pregnancy outcomes in couples with unexplained infertility. \nMaterial and Method: 217 couples aged 24-39 years with unexplained infertility and treated with IUI by way of OS participated in our study. The patients were divided into 2 groups of which the first included the clinically pregnant and the second did not, and were compared in terms of age, monofollicle and bifollicle development, infertility duration, treatment initiation day, hcg day, leading follicle diameter, endometrial thickness, number of dominant follicles and treatment type. \nResults: Of the 217 patients who underwent IUI for unexplained infertility, no significant difference was found between the groups with and without clinical pregnancy in terms of the number of dominant follicles (p=0.73). There was a positive but low correlation between endometrial thickness and treatment success (Spearman's correlation coefficient value = 0.14, p=0.03). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value for endometrial thickness to predict pregnancy success was 9.5 mm (55.0% sensitivity, 65.0% specificity). \nConclusions: As a result, we suggest that gonadotropins are not superior to oral agents in terms of clinical pregnancy rates in unexplained infertility, therefore treatment should commence with less invasive and less costly oral agents. Furthermore, we think that the number of dominant follicles (monofollicles or bifollicles) created by ovarian stimulation does not affect clinical pregnancy success, but endometrial thickness is closely related to pregnancy rates and deserves attention.","PeriodicalId":119624,"journal":{"name":"Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1307300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the number of dominant follicles formed in IUI with ovarian stimulation (OS) affects pregnancy outcomes in couples with unexplained infertility. Material and Method: 217 couples aged 24-39 years with unexplained infertility and treated with IUI by way of OS participated in our study. The patients were divided into 2 groups of which the first included the clinically pregnant and the second did not, and were compared in terms of age, monofollicle and bifollicle development, infertility duration, treatment initiation day, hcg day, leading follicle diameter, endometrial thickness, number of dominant follicles and treatment type. Results: Of the 217 patients who underwent IUI for unexplained infertility, no significant difference was found between the groups with and without clinical pregnancy in terms of the number of dominant follicles (p=0.73). There was a positive but low correlation between endometrial thickness and treatment success (Spearman's correlation coefficient value = 0.14, p=0.03). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value for endometrial thickness to predict pregnancy success was 9.5 mm (55.0% sensitivity, 65.0% specificity). Conclusions: As a result, we suggest that gonadotropins are not superior to oral agents in terms of clinical pregnancy rates in unexplained infertility, therefore treatment should commence with less invasive and less costly oral agents. Furthermore, we think that the number of dominant follicles (monofollicles or bifollicles) created by ovarian stimulation does not affect clinical pregnancy success, but endometrial thickness is closely related to pregnancy rates and deserves attention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:本研究的目的是探讨卵巢刺激(OS)人工授精(IUI)中形成的优势卵泡数量是否影响不明原因不孕夫妇的妊娠结局。材料与方法:217对年龄24-39岁不明原因不孕症经人工授精手术治疗的夫妇参与研究。将患者分为临床妊娠组和非临床妊娠组,比较年龄、单卵泡和双卵泡发育情况、不孕症持续时间、开始治疗日、hcg日、先导卵泡直径、子宫内膜厚度、优势卵泡数和治疗方式。结果:217例不明原因不孕症行人工授精的患者中,有无临床妊娠组优势卵泡数差异无统计学意义(p=0.73)。子宫内膜厚度与治疗成功率呈正相关,但相关性较低(Spearman相关系数值= 0.14,p=0.03)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,子宫内膜厚度预测妊娠成功的最佳临界值为9.5 mm(敏感性55.0%,特异性65.0%)。结论:因此,我们建议在不明原因不孕症的临床妊娠率方面,促性腺激素并不优于口服药物,因此治疗应从侵入性较小、费用较低的口服药物开始。此外,我们认为卵巢刺激产生的优势卵泡(单卵泡或双卵泡)数量并不影响临床妊娠成功,但子宫内膜厚度与妊娠率密切相关,值得关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fetal Abdomen Çapı Ölçümü ile Omuz Distosisi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi-Retrospektif Vaka Kontrol Çalışması TÜRKİYE SEZARYEN ORANI DURUM ANALİZİ VE POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ Assessment of the Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio in Predicting the Severity of Hyperemesis Gravidarum Huge Adnexal Masses Managed by Single Port Laparoscopy: A case series Evaluation of Inflammation Markers and Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Intrauterin Insemination (IUI) for Unexplained Infertility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1