THE GENESIS OF SCIENTIFIC VIEWS IN THE FIELD OF DETERMINING THE ESSENCE OF CONTROL AND SUPERVISORY ACTIVITIES

Yana S. Ankudinova
{"title":"THE GENESIS OF SCIENTIFIC VIEWS IN THE FIELD OF DETERMINING THE ESSENCE OF CONTROL AND SUPERVISORY ACTIVITIES","authors":"Yana S. Ankudinova","doi":"10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-4-299-307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes scientific papers on the essence of control and supervisory activities and the terms control and supervision. The author identifies issues that require theoretical and practical solutions. It is established that the existing educational and scientific research in the field of control and supervisory activities consider a number of issues, in particular: theoretical aspects of defining the concepts of control and supervision, general issues of the relationship of these concepts and the organization of control and supervisory activities. The article provides definitions of the terms control and supervision, including the normative definition of such a category as state control. The author has made another attempt to formulate his own opinion on the relationship of the terms control and supervision. The paper distinguishes the main approaches of scientists to the question of the correlation of terms into three groups: the first considers supervision as part of control; the second group correlates control and supervision as equal categories; the third group includes the position of scientists on the independent meaning of the concepts of supervision and control, within the framework of consideration of each of the groups, the author analyzes the available scientific views.","PeriodicalId":275116,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","volume":"41 168","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-4-299-307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes scientific papers on the essence of control and supervisory activities and the terms control and supervision. The author identifies issues that require theoretical and practical solutions. It is established that the existing educational and scientific research in the field of control and supervisory activities consider a number of issues, in particular: theoretical aspects of defining the concepts of control and supervision, general issues of the relationship of these concepts and the organization of control and supervisory activities. The article provides definitions of the terms control and supervision, including the normative definition of such a category as state control. The author has made another attempt to formulate his own opinion on the relationship of the terms control and supervision. The paper distinguishes the main approaches of scientists to the question of the correlation of terms into three groups: the first considers supervision as part of control; the second group correlates control and supervision as equal categories; the third group includes the position of scientists on the independent meaning of the concepts of supervision and control, within the framework of consideration of each of the groups, the author analyzes the available scientific views.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学观点在确定控制和监督活动本质领域的起源
本文分析了科技论文中控制与监督活动的本质以及控制与监督的概念。作者指出了需要理论和实践解决方案的问题。现有的控制和监督活动领域的教育和科学研究考虑了许多问题,特别是:定义控制和监督概念的理论方面,这些概念的关系和组织控制和监督活动的一般问题。本文对“控制”和“监督”这两个术语进行了界定,包括对“国家控制”这一类别的规范定义。笔者试图对术语控制与监督的关系提出自己的看法。本文将科学家处理术语关联问题的主要方法分为三类:第一类将监督视为控制的一部分;第二组将控制和监督作为平等的类别联系起来;第三组包括科学家对监督和控制概念的独立意义的立场,在考虑每组的框架内,笔者分析了现有的科学观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ENSURING THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO EQUAL ACCESS TO PUBLIC SERVICE IN THE LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION THE DUALISM OF NATURAL AND POSITIVE LAW: THE ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL PERIOD THE ESSENCE OF MODERN PROBLEMS OF STATE SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE IN RUSSIA PROGRAMMATIC DE-EXTREMIZATION OF MIGRATION PROCESSES: QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE LEGAL ISSUES OF THE ACTIVITIES OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA IN THE PROVISION OF SERVICES TO THE POPULATION: ASSESSMENT OF EFFICIENCY AND WAYS OF IMPROVEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1