Modern Political History of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ešref Kenan Rašidagić
{"title":"Modern Political History of Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"Ešref Kenan Rašidagić","doi":"10.47999/BOS.2021.5.1.20-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Bosnia and Herzegovina’s declaration of independence in 1995, its path has been a rocky one. Unwillingness by the international community to stand by the central government and stand in the way of the neighboring states of Serbia and Croatia’s territorial pretensions, produced a succession of ceasefire agreements, culminating in the final, Dayton Peace Agreement. Each of these agreements espoused the ethnic principle as the guiding philosophy for the organization of the state. The post-war period demonstrates that despite the passage of time, the principle of organization of multi-ethnic state along ethnic lines presents a stumbling block to the functioning of the political, economic and social life in the country. The political history of post-independence Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) therefore reads as a history of protracted political paralysis, with no hope of rectifying the problems without another forceful intervention of the international community.","PeriodicalId":403068,"journal":{"name":"Bosnian Studies: Journal for Research of Bosnian Thought and Culture","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bosnian Studies: Journal for Research of Bosnian Thought and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47999/BOS.2021.5.1.20-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since Bosnia and Herzegovina’s declaration of independence in 1995, its path has been a rocky one. Unwillingness by the international community to stand by the central government and stand in the way of the neighboring states of Serbia and Croatia’s territorial pretensions, produced a succession of ceasefire agreements, culminating in the final, Dayton Peace Agreement. Each of these agreements espoused the ethnic principle as the guiding philosophy for the organization of the state. The post-war period demonstrates that despite the passage of time, the principle of organization of multi-ethnic state along ethnic lines presents a stumbling block to the functioning of the political, economic and social life in the country. The political history of post-independence Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) therefore reads as a history of protracted political paralysis, with no hope of rectifying the problems without another forceful intervention of the international community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那现代政治史
自 1995 年波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那宣布独立以来,它的道路一直是坎坷的。由于国际社会不愿支持波黑中央政府,也不愿阻碍邻国塞尔维亚和克罗地亚的领土要求,波黑先后签署了一系列停火协议,最终达成了《代顿和平协定》。这些协议都将民族原则作为国家组织的指导思想。战后时期的情况表明,尽管时过境迁,但按民族划分多民族国家的组织原则仍然是该国政治、经济和社会生活运作的绊脚石。因此,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(B&H)独立后的政治历史是一部长期政治瘫痪的历史,如果国际社会不再次进行强有力的干预,就没有希望纠正这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Political History of Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1