Detention Operations in Non-International Armed Conflicts between International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law and National Standards: A NATO Perspective

Steven A. Hill, Leonard Holzer
{"title":"Detention Operations in Non-International Armed Conflicts between International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law and National Standards: A NATO Perspective","authors":"Steven A. Hill, Leonard Holzer","doi":"10.1163/9789004404601_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detention poses a challenge to coalitions of States and multinational alliances, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), when conducting military operations in non-international armed conflicts (“NIACs”). There is a potential for misunderstandings in multinational operations resulting from different standards and procedures being applied by troop contributing Nations. Over the years, NATO has undertaken efforts to bridge differing national standards and provide common procedures as well as minimum standards in NIAC Alliance operations. Lessons can be drawn from NATO’s multilateral experience, particularly since detention remains an area that tends to raise particular challenges of legal interoperability and will likely do so in the future. Building on NATO's experience in Kosovo and Afghanistan, this article outlines the three major challenges NATO faces when conducting detention operations in a NIAC. It concludes by suggesting NATO as a forum for reducing legal uncertainty in the field of NIAC detention and by highlighting practical examples of how the Alliance is already taking promising steps in this direction.","PeriodicalId":297179,"journal":{"name":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 49 (2019)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 49 (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004404601_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detention poses a challenge to coalitions of States and multinational alliances, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), when conducting military operations in non-international armed conflicts (“NIACs”). There is a potential for misunderstandings in multinational operations resulting from different standards and procedures being applied by troop contributing Nations. Over the years, NATO has undertaken efforts to bridge differing national standards and provide common procedures as well as minimum standards in NIAC Alliance operations. Lessons can be drawn from NATO’s multilateral experience, particularly since detention remains an area that tends to raise particular challenges of legal interoperability and will likely do so in the future. Building on NATO's experience in Kosovo and Afghanistan, this article outlines the three major challenges NATO faces when conducting detention operations in a NIAC. It concludes by suggesting NATO as a forum for reducing legal uncertainty in the field of NIAC detention and by highlighting practical examples of how the Alliance is already taking promising steps in this direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际人道法、人权法和国家标准之间的非国际性武装冲突中的拘留行动:一个北约的视角
拘留对在非国际性武装冲突中进行军事行动的国家联盟和多国联盟,如北大西洋公约组织(北约)构成挑战。由于部队派遣国采用不同的标准和程序,在多国行动中有可能产生误解。多年来,北约一直在努力弥合不同的国家标准,并在NIAC联盟行动中提供共同程序和最低标准。可以从北约的多边经验中吸取教训,特别是因为拘留仍然是一个往往会对法律互操作性提出特别挑战的领域,而且未来很可能会这样做。基于北约在科索沃和阿富汗的经验,本文概述了北约在NIAC开展拘留行动时面临的三大挑战。最后,它建议北约作为一个论坛,以减少在非本国公民拘留领域的法律不确定性,并强调了联盟如何已经在这方面采取有希望的步骤的实际例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Judgments of the Supreme Court of Israel Relating to Human Rights Airstrikes, UAVs and Fully Autonomous Weapon Systems, and the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law Invalidations of Laws in Israel in a Comparative Perspective Is International Law Relevant to the Arab-Israeli Conflict? Preliminary Material
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1