Imperialism, the Mismeasurement of Poverty, and the Masking of Global Exploitation

S. Donnelly
{"title":"Imperialism, the Mismeasurement of Poverty, and the Masking of Global Exploitation","authors":"S. Donnelly","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter deconstructs the widely publicized set of statistics purportedly showing that extreme poverty in the world has fallen dramatically since 1990 as articulated by the World Bank and reiterated by leading UN institutions, neoliberal think tanks, publications, and spokespersons. The analytical categories and methodology employed by the World Bank to calculate its poverty statistics are subjected to a systematic critique, demonstrating that they serve the interests of economic imperialism. By artificially reducing global poverty through the statistical manipulation of its poverty metric, the World Bank can trumpet the success of neoliberalism, legitimating its further expansion through US-backed coups in countries such as Haiti and Bolivia. The genocidal misery imposed on the people of the Global South by the World Bank and the IMF through neoliberal policies such as structural adjustment programs and free trade agreements is thereby statistically erased, laying the foundation for a narrative of dramatically falling global poverty in the ‘New Millennium’ at odds with reality. If more reasonable metrics are used, such as the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) $5 per day standard, global poverty has clearly not fallen as claimed. The chapter also shows how neoliberalism itself is a form of economic imperialism. Finally, the rise of the BRICS and China in particular, celebrated by neoliberals and some on the left, is analysed as a development that ultimately fortifies, rather than contradicts, the advance of imperialism in the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":410474,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter deconstructs the widely publicized set of statistics purportedly showing that extreme poverty in the world has fallen dramatically since 1990 as articulated by the World Bank and reiterated by leading UN institutions, neoliberal think tanks, publications, and spokespersons. The analytical categories and methodology employed by the World Bank to calculate its poverty statistics are subjected to a systematic critique, demonstrating that they serve the interests of economic imperialism. By artificially reducing global poverty through the statistical manipulation of its poverty metric, the World Bank can trumpet the success of neoliberalism, legitimating its further expansion through US-backed coups in countries such as Haiti and Bolivia. The genocidal misery imposed on the people of the Global South by the World Bank and the IMF through neoliberal policies such as structural adjustment programs and free trade agreements is thereby statistically erased, laying the foundation for a narrative of dramatically falling global poverty in the ‘New Millennium’ at odds with reality. If more reasonable metrics are used, such as the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) $5 per day standard, global poverty has clearly not fallen as claimed. The chapter also shows how neoliberalism itself is a form of economic imperialism. Finally, the rise of the BRICS and China in particular, celebrated by neoliberals and some on the left, is analysed as a development that ultimately fortifies, rather than contradicts, the advance of imperialism in the twenty-first century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帝国主义,对贫困的错误衡量,以及全球剥削的掩饰
本章解构了一组广为宣传的统计数据,这些数据据称表明,自1990年以来,世界上的极端贫困人口急剧下降,这是世界银行所阐述的,也是联合国主要机构、新自由主义智库、出版物和发言人所重申的。世界银行用于计算其贫困统计数据的分析类别和方法受到了系统的批评,表明它们为经济帝国主义的利益服务。通过对贫困指标进行统计操纵,人为地减少全球贫困,世界银行可以鼓吹新自由主义的成功,通过美国支持的海地和玻利维亚等国的政变,使其进一步扩张合法化。世界银行和国际货币基金组织通过结构调整计划和自由贸易协定等新自由主义政策强加给全球南方人民的种族灭绝痛苦因此在统计上被抹去,为“新千年”与现实不符的全球贫困急剧下降的叙述奠定了基础。如果使用更合理的衡量标准,比如联合国贸易和发展会议(UNCTAD)每天5美元的标准,全球贫困显然没有像声称的那样下降。本章还展示了新自由主义本身是经济帝国主义的一种形式。最后,金砖国家的崛起,尤其是中国的崛起,受到新自由主义者和一些左翼人士的赞扬,被分析为一种发展,最终巩固而不是反对帝国主义在21世纪的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power Competition and Exploitation in Southeast Asia Land Grabbing in Southeastern Europe in Historical Context The Clash of Interpretations Asymmetric Interdependence Capitalism, Imperialism, and Crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1