Scaling agile methods to regulated environments: An industry case study

Brian Fitzgerald, Klaas-Jan Stol, Ryan O'Sullivan, Donal O'Brien
{"title":"Scaling agile methods to regulated environments: An industry case study","authors":"Brian Fitzgerald, Klaas-Jan Stol, Ryan O'Sullivan, Donal O'Brien","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile development methods are growing in popularity with a recent survey reporting that more than 80% of organizations now following an agile approach. Agile methods were seen initially as best suited to small, co-located teams developing non-critical systems. The first two constraining characteristics (small and co-located teams) have been addressed as research has emerged describing successful agile adoption involving large teams and distributed contexts. However, the applicability of agile methods for developing safety-critical systems in regulated environments has not yet been demonstrated unequivocally, and very little rigorous research exists in this area. Some of the essential characteristics of agile approaches appear to be incompatible with the constraints imposed by regulated environments. In this study we identify these tension points and illustrate through a detailed case study how an agile approach was implemented successfully in a regulated environment. Among the interesting concepts to emerge from the research are the notions of continuous compliance and living traceability.","PeriodicalId":322423,"journal":{"name":"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"181","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 181

Abstract

Agile development methods are growing in popularity with a recent survey reporting that more than 80% of organizations now following an agile approach. Agile methods were seen initially as best suited to small, co-located teams developing non-critical systems. The first two constraining characteristics (small and co-located teams) have been addressed as research has emerged describing successful agile adoption involving large teams and distributed contexts. However, the applicability of agile methods for developing safety-critical systems in regulated environments has not yet been demonstrated unequivocally, and very little rigorous research exists in this area. Some of the essential characteristics of agile approaches appear to be incompatible with the constraints imposed by regulated environments. In this study we identify these tension points and illustrate through a detailed case study how an agile approach was implemented successfully in a regulated environment. Among the interesting concepts to emerge from the research are the notions of continuous compliance and living traceability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将敏捷方法扩展到受监管的环境:一个行业案例研究
敏捷开发方法越来越受欢迎,最近的一项调查报告显示,超过80%的组织正在采用敏捷方法。敏捷方法最初被认为最适合于小型的、位于同一地点的团队开发非关键系统。前两个约束特征(小型和位于同一地点的团队)在描述涉及大型团队和分布式环境的成功敏捷采用的研究中已经得到了解决。然而,敏捷方法在规范环境中开发安全关键系统的适用性尚未得到明确证明,并且在该领域存在很少严谨的研究。敏捷方法的一些基本特征似乎与受监管的环境所施加的约束不相容。在本研究中,我们确定了这些紧张点,并通过详细的案例研究说明了敏捷方法如何在受监管的环境中成功实施。从研究中出现的有趣概念包括持续遵从性和生活可追溯性的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studios in software engineering education: Towards an evaluable model Not going to take this anymore: Multi-objective overtime planning for Software Engineering projects 3rd International workshop on collaborative teaching of globally distributed software development (CTGDSD 2013) TestEvol: A tool for analyzing test-suite evolution A characteristic study on failures of production distributed data-parallel programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1