GWP® - The Weighing Standard: Why We Should Challenge the Established Way We Calibrate and Test Weighing Instruments

K. Fritsch
{"title":"GWP® - The Weighing Standard: Why We Should Challenge the Established Way We Calibrate and Test Weighing Instruments","authors":"K. Fritsch","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the pharmaceutical laboratory, weighing is only one step of a whole analysis chain in drug discovery and quality control; however it strongly influences the overall quality and integrity of the final result. Also in production, weighing is decisive to achieve batch uniformity and consistency, e.g. in dispensing or formulation processes. For the food industry, accurate weighing processes also act as an important contribution for two of its most demanding challenges: Increasing public health and consumer safety, and increasing productivity and competitiveness. The same or similar issues are also prevalent in other industries as the chemical, fragrance or automotive industry, and also apply for testing labs and companies focusing on contract research and manufacturing. Everywhere, accurate weighing is essential to ensure continuous adherence to predefined process requirements and to avoid a frequent source of Out of Specification results (OOS).This article introduces GWP®, the science-based global standard for efficient lifecycle management of weighing instruments. It consists of the selection of the appropriate weighing system based on the evaluation of the respective weighing process requirements, and provides scientific guidance to the user regarding calibration and testing during the instrument's lifecycle. Based primarily on the user’s weighing requirements and prevailing weighing risks, it provides a state-of-the-art strategy to reduce measurement errors and to ensure reproducibly accurate weighing results. The understanding of the particular weighing process requirements and important balance and scale properties as minimum weight is essential to select an appropriate weighing system in the framework of the design qualification. The performance qualification takes into account these requirements and risks to establish a specific routine testing scenario for the instrument. The higher the impact in case of inaccurate weighings, and the more stringent the weighing accuracy requirements are the more frequently calibration and user tests have to be carried out. However, for less risky and stringent applications, testing efforts can be reduced accordingly. Widespread misconceptions • specifically in respect to the definition of test procedures and the selection of appropriate weights for periodic performance verification • are critically analyzed. Based on scientific principles the user is guided on how to optimize his routine testing procedures and how to avoid unnecessary or even erroneous testing. Risk and life cycle management form an integrated part of the overall strategy of GWP® to bridge the gap between regulatory compliance, process quality, productivity and cost consciousness.","PeriodicalId":445779,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the pharmaceutical laboratory, weighing is only one step of a whole analysis chain in drug discovery and quality control; however it strongly influences the overall quality and integrity of the final result. Also in production, weighing is decisive to achieve batch uniformity and consistency, e.g. in dispensing or formulation processes. For the food industry, accurate weighing processes also act as an important contribution for two of its most demanding challenges: Increasing public health and consumer safety, and increasing productivity and competitiveness. The same or similar issues are also prevalent in other industries as the chemical, fragrance or automotive industry, and also apply for testing labs and companies focusing on contract research and manufacturing. Everywhere, accurate weighing is essential to ensure continuous adherence to predefined process requirements and to avoid a frequent source of Out of Specification results (OOS).This article introduces GWP®, the science-based global standard for efficient lifecycle management of weighing instruments. It consists of the selection of the appropriate weighing system based on the evaluation of the respective weighing process requirements, and provides scientific guidance to the user regarding calibration and testing during the instrument's lifecycle. Based primarily on the user’s weighing requirements and prevailing weighing risks, it provides a state-of-the-art strategy to reduce measurement errors and to ensure reproducibly accurate weighing results. The understanding of the particular weighing process requirements and important balance and scale properties as minimum weight is essential to select an appropriate weighing system in the framework of the design qualification. The performance qualification takes into account these requirements and risks to establish a specific routine testing scenario for the instrument. The higher the impact in case of inaccurate weighings, and the more stringent the weighing accuracy requirements are the more frequently calibration and user tests have to be carried out. However, for less risky and stringent applications, testing efforts can be reduced accordingly. Widespread misconceptions • specifically in respect to the definition of test procedures and the selection of appropriate weights for periodic performance verification • are critically analyzed. Based on scientific principles the user is guided on how to optimize his routine testing procedures and how to avoid unnecessary or even erroneous testing. Risk and life cycle management form an integrated part of the overall strategy of GWP® to bridge the gap between regulatory compliance, process quality, productivity and cost consciousness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GWP®-称重标准:为什么我们应该挑战我们校准和测试称重仪器的既定方式
在制药实验室中,称重只是药物发现和质量控制整个分析链中的一个步骤;然而,它强烈地影响了最终结果的整体质量和完整性。同样在生产中,称重对于实现批次的均匀性和一致性是决定性的,例如在配药或配方过程中。对于食品行业来说,准确的称重过程也为其面临的两个最严峻的挑战做出了重要贡献:提高公众健康和消费者安全,提高生产力和竞争力。同样或类似的问题也普遍存在于其他行业,如化学、香水或汽车行业,也适用于专注于合同研究和制造的测试实验室和公司。在任何地方,准确的称重都是确保持续遵守预定义的工艺要求和避免经常出现不合格结果(OOS)的必要条件。本文介绍了以科学为基础的全球标准GWP®,用于有效地管理称重仪器的生命周期。它包括在评估各自称重过程要求的基础上选择合适的称重系统,并在仪器的生命周期内为用户提供有关校准和测试的科学指导。主要基于用户的称重要求和普遍的称重风险,它提供了一个最先进的策略,以减少测量误差,并确保可重复准确的称重结果。了解特定的称重过程要求以及重要的天平和天平特性作为最小重量,对于在设计鉴定的框架中选择合适的称重系统至关重要。性能鉴定考虑到这些要求和风险,为仪器建立一个特定的常规测试方案。在称重不准确的情况下,影响越大,称重精度要求越严格,就必须更频繁地进行校准和用户测试。然而,对于风险较小和严格的应用程序,测试工作可以相应减少。广泛的误解•特别是关于测试程序的定义和为定期性能验证选择适当的权重•被批判性地分析。根据科学原理,指导用户如何优化日常测试程序,如何避免不必要甚至错误的测试。风险和生命周期管理是GWP®整体战略的组成部分,旨在弥合法规遵从、流程质量、生产力和成本意识之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determining the Uncertainty of Frequency Measurements Referenced to GPS Disciplined Oscillators The NIST Quality System for Measurement Services: A look at its Past Decade and a Gaze towards its Future New 10V Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS) and its Application for the 2014 NCSLI JVS Interlaboratory Comparison Low Frequency Accelerometer Calibration Chalenges and Improvements Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study Using Modular Instrumentation and Lesson Learned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1