Sabda Raja Sultan Hamengku Buwono X Menurut Aktivis PWNU Yogyakarta Dan Aktivis PWM Yogyakarta: Studi Analisis Terhadap Penghapusan Gelar Khalifatullah

Diana Sitatul Atiq
{"title":"Sabda Raja Sultan Hamengku Buwono X Menurut Aktivis PWNU Yogyakarta Dan Aktivis PWM Yogyakarta: Studi Analisis Terhadap Penghapusan Gelar Khalifatullah","authors":"Diana Sitatul Atiq","doi":"10.14421/al-mazaahib.v4i1.2844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sultanate of Yogyakarta is the legal heir to the Islamic Mataram kingdom with a royal government system that still exists today. In the system of royal government, a Sultan (king) has the highest absolute authority, both in the form of prohibitions and orders. This research is a field research using the interview method with Nahdlatul Ulama activists (PWNU Yogyakarta) and Muhammadiyah activists (PWM Yogyakarta). This research is descriptive analytic in nature, namely an attempt to describe and collect data related to the removal of the title Khalifatullah, then an analysis of the data is carried out based on existing theories in Islamic law. The results showed that Nahdlatul Ulama activists refused to abolish the Khalifatullah title on the grounds that the Khalifatullah title contains al-'urf, and the Khalifatullah title has become a legitimacy and recognition that the line of power in the Palace is based on male offspring. Whereas Muhammadiyah activists refused to abolish the title on the grounds that they were in the leadership of the Keraton, the tradition of changing power was to adhere to a patriarchal system, and the title Khalifatullah was an affirmation that men were the ones who had the right to inherit the leadership of the Keraton. According to the author's analysis, Nahdlatul Ulama activists use the Ijtihad Jamâ'i method, namely in extracting and making decisions related to their rejection of the abolition of the Khalifatullah title by practicing qawa'id ushuliyyâh and qawa'id fiqhiyyâh and through deliberations and in-depth discussions by gathering people who understand the the problems, namely the clergy, government experts and the royal family of the palace. Whereas Muhammadiyah activists use the Al-Ijtihâd al-Istislahi method, which is more based on the illat or benefits obtained.","PeriodicalId":375931,"journal":{"name":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v4i1.2844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sultanate of Yogyakarta is the legal heir to the Islamic Mataram kingdom with a royal government system that still exists today. In the system of royal government, a Sultan (king) has the highest absolute authority, both in the form of prohibitions and orders. This research is a field research using the interview method with Nahdlatul Ulama activists (PWNU Yogyakarta) and Muhammadiyah activists (PWM Yogyakarta). This research is descriptive analytic in nature, namely an attempt to describe and collect data related to the removal of the title Khalifatullah, then an analysis of the data is carried out based on existing theories in Islamic law. The results showed that Nahdlatul Ulama activists refused to abolish the Khalifatullah title on the grounds that the Khalifatullah title contains al-'urf, and the Khalifatullah title has become a legitimacy and recognition that the line of power in the Palace is based on male offspring. Whereas Muhammadiyah activists refused to abolish the title on the grounds that they were in the leadership of the Keraton, the tradition of changing power was to adhere to a patriarchal system, and the title Khalifatullah was an affirmation that men were the ones who had the right to inherit the leadership of the Keraton. According to the author's analysis, Nahdlatul Ulama activists use the Ijtihad Jamâ'i method, namely in extracting and making decisions related to their rejection of the abolition of the Khalifatullah title by practicing qawa'id ushuliyyâh and qawa'id fiqhiyyâh and through deliberations and in-depth discussions by gathering people who understand the the problems, namely the clergy, government experts and the royal family of the palace. Whereas Muhammadiyah activists use the Al-Ijtihâd al-Istislahi method, which is more based on the illat or benefits obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日惹苏丹国是伊斯兰马塔兰王国的合法继承人,其皇家政府制度至今仍存在。在皇家政府体制中,苏丹(国王)拥有最高的绝对权力,无论是以禁令还是命令的形式。本研究是一项实地调查,采用访谈的方法,与Nahdlatul Ulama活动家(PWNU日惹)和Muhammadiyah活动家(PWM日惹)。本研究本质上是描述性的分析,即试图描述和收集与Khalifatullah头衔被取消有关的数据,然后根据现有的伊斯兰法律理论对这些数据进行分析。结果显示,Nahdlatul Ulama活动家拒绝废除Khalifatullah头衔,理由是Khalifatullah头衔包含al-'urf, Khalifatullah头衔已经成为一种合法性,并承认宫殿中的权力路线是基于男性后代的。穆罕默迪亚激进分子拒绝废除这一头衔,理由是他们是喀拉顿的领导人,而改变权力的传统是坚持父权制度,而哈利法图拉的头衔是一种肯定,即男性有权继承喀拉顿的领导权。根据作者的分析,Nahdlatul Ulama活动家使用Ijtihad jam 'i方法,即通过实践qawa'id ushuliyy和qawa'id fiqhiyy,并通过召集了解问题的人,即神职人员、政府专家和宫廷王室,进行审议和深入讨论,提取和作出与他们拒绝废除Khalifatullah头衔有关的决定。而穆罕默迪亚激进分子使用的是al- ijtih - al-Istislahi方法,这种方法更多的是基于所获得的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adopting Comparative Fiqh Methodology in Islamic Jurisprudence: Facing Contemporary Challenges with Ethical Considerations The Formalist vs Realist Constructs on Marriage Registration in Indonesia: A Study of the Perspectives of Kyai from Nahdlatul Ulama in Rembang Seeking Harmony over Punishment: Restorative Justice Approaches to Domestic Violence in Islamic and Indonesian Legal Frameworks Gray Divorce at Palembang Religious Court 2022: Factors Associated with Old Age Divorce Pemilihan Makanan dan Minuman Yang Tidak Memiliki Sertifikat Halal: Kajian Maqashid Asy-Syari’ah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1