Bacteriological Quality and Safety Analysis of Fruit Juices in Some Selected Fruit Juice Houses in Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia

A. C.
{"title":"Bacteriological Quality and Safety Analysis of Fruit Juices in Some Selected Fruit Juice Houses in Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia","authors":"A. C.","doi":"10.23880/oajmb-16000249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fresh fruit juices are very important components of the human diet and there is considerable evidence of the health and nutritional benefits associated with the consumption. However, during processing contaminants from raw materials, equipment or food handlers could be easily transferred to the final product of fruit juices resulting in food borne illnesses. This community-based study was conducted in Wolaita sodo town using both laboratory experiments and questionnaire. The aim of the study was to assess the bacteriological quality and safety of locally prepared unpasteurized fruit juices from fruit juice houses in Wolaita sodo town. The questionnaire was used to assess source of fruit, way of processing and handling of fruit juices. The total viable bacterial count of avocado and mango ranged between 2.05x105 - 5x105 cfu/ml and 1x105 - 3x105 cfu/ ml, respectively. The total Staphylococcus counts from avocado and mango were between 2 x105 - 4x105 cfu/ml and 2.1x105 - 2.75x105 cfu/ml, respectively. The total coliform counts of avocado and mango were found to be 1.15x105 - 3.25x105 and 1x105 - 3 x105 cfu/ml, respectively. From a total of 72 samples, 13.8%, of the avocado and 5.55% of the mango samples were detected positive for Staphylococcus aureus whereas Escherichia coli were found in 11% of avocado and 5.55% of mango samples. None of the mango samples were positive for Streptococcus spp and Shigella spp while these species were detected in avocado with 2.77% and 5.55%, respectively. The chemical treatment using 0.1% sodium benzoate was the most effective in reducing total viable bacterial count followed by lemon squeeze. All of the pathogenic bacteria were found to be resistant to penicillin and ampicillin, and almost all were sensitive to erythromycin and ceftriaxone. Most venders obtained fruits from the open market and most juice makers lacked training in food hygiene and safety.","PeriodicalId":257510,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology","volume":"14 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajmb-16000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fresh fruit juices are very important components of the human diet and there is considerable evidence of the health and nutritional benefits associated with the consumption. However, during processing contaminants from raw materials, equipment or food handlers could be easily transferred to the final product of fruit juices resulting in food borne illnesses. This community-based study was conducted in Wolaita sodo town using both laboratory experiments and questionnaire. The aim of the study was to assess the bacteriological quality and safety of locally prepared unpasteurized fruit juices from fruit juice houses in Wolaita sodo town. The questionnaire was used to assess source of fruit, way of processing and handling of fruit juices. The total viable bacterial count of avocado and mango ranged between 2.05x105 - 5x105 cfu/ml and 1x105 - 3x105 cfu/ ml, respectively. The total Staphylococcus counts from avocado and mango were between 2 x105 - 4x105 cfu/ml and 2.1x105 - 2.75x105 cfu/ml, respectively. The total coliform counts of avocado and mango were found to be 1.15x105 - 3.25x105 and 1x105 - 3 x105 cfu/ml, respectively. From a total of 72 samples, 13.8%, of the avocado and 5.55% of the mango samples were detected positive for Staphylococcus aureus whereas Escherichia coli were found in 11% of avocado and 5.55% of mango samples. None of the mango samples were positive for Streptococcus spp and Shigella spp while these species were detected in avocado with 2.77% and 5.55%, respectively. The chemical treatment using 0.1% sodium benzoate was the most effective in reducing total viable bacterial count followed by lemon squeeze. All of the pathogenic bacteria were found to be resistant to penicillin and ampicillin, and almost all were sensitive to erythromycin and ceftriaxone. Most venders obtained fruits from the open market and most juice makers lacked training in food hygiene and safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚南部Wolaita Sodo镇部分果汁屋果汁的细菌学质量安全分析
新鲜果汁是人类饮食中非常重要的组成部分,有大量证据表明,饮用果汁对健康和营养有益。然而,在加工过程中,来自原材料、设备或食品处理人员的污染物很容易转移到果汁的最终产品中,导致食源性疾病。本研究采用实验室实验和问卷调查相结合的方法,在Wolaita sodo镇开展社区研究。本研究的目的是评估Wolaita sodo镇当地果汁店生产的未经高温消毒的果汁的细菌学质量和安全性。通过问卷调查对水果的来源、果汁的加工和处理方式进行评价。牛油果和芒果的活菌总数分别为2.05 × 105 ~ 5x105 cfu/ml和1x105 ~ 3x105 cfu/ml。牛油果和芒果的葡萄球菌总数分别在2 × 105 ~ 4 × 105 cfu/ml和2.1 × 105 ~ 2.75 × 105 cfu/ml之间。牛油果和芒果的大肠菌群总数分别为1.15 × 105 ~ 3.25 × 105和1 × 105 ~ 3 × 105 cfu/ml。在总共72个样本中,13.8%的鳄梨和5.55%的芒果样本检测出金黄色葡萄球菌阳性,而11%的鳄梨和5.55%的芒果样本检测出大肠杆菌。芒果样品中未检出链球菌和志贺氏菌,而鳄梨样品中分别检出了2.77%和5.55%的链球菌和志贺氏菌。0.1%苯甲酸钠的化学处理对减少总活菌数最有效,其次是柠檬汁。所有病原菌均对青霉素和氨苄西林耐药,对红霉素和头孢曲松几乎全部敏感。大多数商贩从露天市场购买水果,大多数果汁生产商缺乏食品卫生和安全方面的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Versatility and Potential of Microbial Cellulose: Applications, Producers, and Sustainable Production Methods Bioremediation of Some Organic Pollutants in the Aquatic Environment; the Egyptian and the Global Experiences A Review of Nanofiber Coating Technology for Future Food Packaging Anthropogenic Changes in Land Use Impact the Emergence and Transmission of Infectious Diseases Overview of Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Bacteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1