Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach in Coronary Angiography and Intervention

S. Kanjanauthai, R. Napier, T. Raja, V. Arora
{"title":"Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach in Coronary Angiography and Intervention","authors":"S. Kanjanauthai, R. Napier, T. Raja, V. Arora","doi":"10.1177/2150133510393496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is still debated whether a transradial approach or a transfemoral approach is better for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. This article will provide a focused review on different aspects of the two approaches.","PeriodicalId":320506,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Cath Lab Director","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Cath Lab Director","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2150133510393496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is still debated whether a transradial approach or a transfemoral approach is better for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. This article will provide a focused review on different aspects of the two approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经桡动脉与经股动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和介入中的应用
对于冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,经桡动脉入路和经股动脉入路孰优孰优仍有争议。本文将重点回顾这两种方法的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HIPAA 5010 RAC Prepayment Audits Delayed Optical Coherence Tomography Why Do I Need To Know About HIPAA 5010 and ICD-10-CM? Congenital Absence of Left Circumflex Artery With Origin of Left Anterior Descending Artery From Right Sinus of Valsalva
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1