Sen's Theorem: Geometric Proof, New Interpretations

Lingfang Li, D. Saari
{"title":"Sen's Theorem: Geometric Proof, New Interpretations","authors":"Lingfang Li, D. Saari","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1028364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sen's classic social choice result supposedly demonstrates a conflict between Pareto and even minimal forms of liberalism. By providing the first direct mathematical proof of this seminal result, we underscore a significantly different interpretation: rather than conflicts among rights, Sen's result occurs because the liberalism assumption negates the assumption that voters have transitive preferences. This explanation enriches interpretations of Sen's conclusion by including radically new kinds of societal conflicts, it suggests ways to sidestep these difficulties, and it explains earlier approaches to avoid the difficulties.","PeriodicalId":299964,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Sen's classic social choice result supposedly demonstrates a conflict between Pareto and even minimal forms of liberalism. By providing the first direct mathematical proof of this seminal result, we underscore a significantly different interpretation: rather than conflicts among rights, Sen's result occurs because the liberalism assumption negates the assumption that voters have transitive preferences. This explanation enriches interpretations of Sen's conclusion by including radically new kinds of societal conflicts, it suggests ways to sidestep these difficulties, and it explains earlier approaches to avoid the difficulties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森定理:几何证明,新解释
森的经典社会选择结果被认为是帕累托和最小形式的自由主义之间的冲突。通过为这一开创性结果提供第一个直接的数学证明,我们强调了一种截然不同的解释:森的结果之所以出现,是因为自由主义假设否定了选民具有传递性偏好的假设,而不是权利之间的冲突。这种解释丰富了对Sen结论的解释,包括了全新的社会冲突类型,它提出了回避这些困难的方法,并解释了早期避免这些困难的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Experience is (Not) Everything: Sequential Outcomes and Social Decision-Making Zum Praktischen Anwendungsnutzen Der Entscheidungstheorie (About the Practical Application of Decision Theory) Geometric Dispersion Theory for Decisions Under Risk: Accurate Out-of-Sample Predictions and Four Distinct Behavioral Patterns Ambiguity Preferences and Portfolio Choices: Evidence from the Field Expected Comparative Utility Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1