Antarctic planetary wave spectrum under different polar vortex conditions in 2019 and 2020 based on total ozone column data

А. Grytsai, G. Milinevsky, Yulia Andrienko, A. Klekociuk, Y. Rapoport, O. Ivaniha
{"title":"Antarctic planetary wave spectrum under different polar vortex conditions in 2019 and 2020 based on total ozone column data","authors":"А. Grytsai, G. Milinevsky, Yulia Andrienko, A. Klekociuk, Y. Rapoport, O. Ivaniha","doi":"10.33275/1727-7485.1.2022.687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the zonal wavenumber spectrum of planetary (Rossby) waves in the atmosphere above Antarctica in each of two contrasting years: in 2019, when there was a sudden stratospheric warming (SSW), and in 2020 when the Antarctic stratospheric vortex was unusually strong and long-lived. The ozone hole (OH) is developed over Antarctica in spring, and its state depends on disturbances of the stratospheric polar vortex by planetary waves (PW). Our analysis uses data on the distribution of the total ozone column from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument on the Aura satellite and ground-based measurements from the Dobson spectrophotometer at the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station in Antarctica. The 2019 SSW strongly displaced the Antarctic vortex off-pole and aided the breakdown of the ozone hole. The SSW occurred during the peak activity of quasi-stationary planetary wave-1, which was enhanced at the time of the warming by the large amplitude of traveling wave-2. In the spring of 2020, the stratospheric polar vortex was relatively undisturbed, allowing the OH area to attain a size close to its historical maximum. A factor in 2020 that aided the stability of the vortex was the relatively small amplitude of wave-1. The stability was maintained despite regular periods when the amplitude of traveling wave-2 attained or even exceeded values around the time of the SSW in 2019. We find that a factor contributing to the differences between the wave effects in the two years is the dynamics of the quasi-stationary wave-1. Anticorrelation of the wave-1 and wave-2 amplitudes near the edge of the vortex was clearly observed in 2020, which can be caused by the transfer of planetary wave energy between different spectral wave components, unlike the situation in 2019.","PeriodicalId":370867,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Antarctic Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Antarctic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2022.687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the zonal wavenumber spectrum of planetary (Rossby) waves in the atmosphere above Antarctica in each of two contrasting years: in 2019, when there was a sudden stratospheric warming (SSW), and in 2020 when the Antarctic stratospheric vortex was unusually strong and long-lived. The ozone hole (OH) is developed over Antarctica in spring, and its state depends on disturbances of the stratospheric polar vortex by planetary waves (PW). Our analysis uses data on the distribution of the total ozone column from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument on the Aura satellite and ground-based measurements from the Dobson spectrophotometer at the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station in Antarctica. The 2019 SSW strongly displaced the Antarctic vortex off-pole and aided the breakdown of the ozone hole. The SSW occurred during the peak activity of quasi-stationary planetary wave-1, which was enhanced at the time of the warming by the large amplitude of traveling wave-2. In the spring of 2020, the stratospheric polar vortex was relatively undisturbed, allowing the OH area to attain a size close to its historical maximum. A factor in 2020 that aided the stability of the vortex was the relatively small amplitude of wave-1. The stability was maintained despite regular periods when the amplitude of traveling wave-2 attained or even exceeded values around the time of the SSW in 2019. We find that a factor contributing to the differences between the wave effects in the two years is the dynamics of the quasi-stationary wave-1. Anticorrelation of the wave-1 and wave-2 amplitudes near the edge of the vortex was clearly observed in 2020, which can be caused by the transfer of planetary wave energy between different spectral wave components, unlike the situation in 2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于总臭氧柱数据的2019年和2020年不同极涡条件下南极行星波谱
我们研究了南极洲上空大气中行星(罗斯比)波的纬向波数谱,这是两个截然不同的年份:2019年,平流层突然变暖(SSW),而2020年,南极平流层涡旋异常强烈且持续时间长。臭氧空洞(OH)是春季在南极洲上空形成的,它的状态取决于行星波(PW)对平流层极涡的扰动。我们的分析使用了Aura卫星上臭氧监测仪的总臭氧柱分布数据和乌克兰南极科学院沃尔纳德斯基站多布森分光光度计的地面测量数据。2019年的西南涡旋强烈地将南极涡旋移离了极点,并帮助臭氧洞的破裂。SSW发生在准平稳行星波1的活动高峰期间,在变暖期间,行波2的大振幅增强了SSW。在2020年春季,平流层极地涡旋相对不受干扰,使OH面积达到接近历史最大值的大小。在2020年,帮助涡旋稳定的一个因素是波1相对较小的振幅。尽管在2019年的SSW前后,行波2的振幅有规律地达到甚至超过了值,但仍保持了稳定性。我们发现,造成两年内波动效应差异的一个因素是准平稳波1的动力学。与2019年不同,2020年在涡旋边缘附近明显观察到波1和波2振幅的反相关,这可能是由于行星波能量在不同谱波分量之间的转移造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Benthic wildlife underwater video recording during longline survey in Weddell Sea Modelling seasonal and intraseasonal variations of circulation,temperature, salinity and sea level in the Bellingshausen Seaand on the Antarctic Peninsula shelf Microclimatic variations of land surface temperatureon Galindez Island (western part of the Antarctic Peninsula) Assessment of the zonal asymmetry trend in Antarctic total ozonecolumn using TOMS measurements and CCMVal-2 models Long-term analysis of the Antarctic total ozone zonal asymmetry by MERRA-2 and CMIP6 data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1