Bronchial Smooth Muscle of Severe Asthmatic Patients Decreases Rhinovirus Replication Within the Epithelium Through a CCL-20/PkR/eIF2alpha-Dependent Pathway

P. Estèves, B. Allard, A. Celle, I. Dupin, E. Maurat, O. Ousova, M. Thumerel, T. Lassere, R. Marthan, P. Girodet, P. Berger, T. Trian
{"title":"Bronchial Smooth Muscle of Severe Asthmatic Patients Decreases Rhinovirus Replication Within the Epithelium Through a CCL-20/PkR/eIF2alpha-Dependent Pathway","authors":"P. Estèves, B. Allard, A. Celle, I. Dupin, E. Maurat, O. Ousova, M. Thumerel, T. Lassere, R. Marthan, P. Girodet, P. Berger, T. Trian","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a2962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Viral infection of the bronchial epithelium (BE), particularly with rhinovirus (RV) has been implicated in the vast majority of exacerbations in severe asthma. Preventing these exacerbations remains a major unmet need. Bronchial remodeling in severe asthma has been characterized by increased bronchial smooth muscle (BSM) mass, which had a poor prognostic value, since higher BSM mass was associated with increased exacerbation rate. However, the role of asthmatic BSM in RV infections of the BE has never been demonstrated. We thus hypothesized that asthmatic BSM increased both BE susceptibility and response to RV infection. We then enrolled 19 severe asthmatic patients from the COBRA cohort, and 37 control subjects. We designed cell biologic, transcriptomic and proteomic approaches both in vitro using coculture model of BE with BSM cells and ex vivo using patients’ biopsies. BE cells were cultured and differentiated in air-liquid interface. RV particle number within BE cells was measured using digital PCR. Proteomic and transcriptomic data were analyzed using IPA (Qiagen). Cytokines concentrations in the supernatant were assessed using ELISA assays. Finally, PkR pathway was analyzed by western blotting. Severe asthmatic patients were similar to control subjects in terms of sex ratio, age and BMI. Not surprisingly asthmatic patients presented a lower FEV-1. We found that asthmatic BSM cells co-cultured with BE cells increased RV replication and level of IL6 in the supernatant compare to that co-cultured with control BSM cells. Large scaled proteomic and transcriptomic analysis highlighted CCL-20 production by asthmatic BSM cells, as a potential candidate to specifically increase the RV infection of the BE cells. Blocking CCL-20 in the co-culture supernatant with asthmatic BSM cells reduced the number of RV particles within the BE cells. Moreover, such a co-culture decreased the PkR pathway activation after RV infection. Indeed, we showed a decreased level of the activated form of PkR and eIF2-alpha. Finally, a direct stimulation of BE cells with CCL-20 reproduced both the increased number of RV particles and the down-regulation of the PkR pathway. In conclusion, these results clearly demonstrated that asthmatic BSM increased the BE response to RV, through an increase of CCL-20 production by BSM, which in turn, down-regulated PKR response of the BE leading to increase RV replication and particles number in BE. To the best of our knowledge, it is the very first time that such a direct bottom-up effect of asthmatic BSM on BE has been demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":188042,"journal":{"name":"B29. INFECTION AND IMMUNE INTERPLAY IN LUNG INJURY","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B29. INFECTION AND IMMUNE INTERPLAY IN LUNG INJURY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a2962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viral infection of the bronchial epithelium (BE), particularly with rhinovirus (RV) has been implicated in the vast majority of exacerbations in severe asthma. Preventing these exacerbations remains a major unmet need. Bronchial remodeling in severe asthma has been characterized by increased bronchial smooth muscle (BSM) mass, which had a poor prognostic value, since higher BSM mass was associated with increased exacerbation rate. However, the role of asthmatic BSM in RV infections of the BE has never been demonstrated. We thus hypothesized that asthmatic BSM increased both BE susceptibility and response to RV infection. We then enrolled 19 severe asthmatic patients from the COBRA cohort, and 37 control subjects. We designed cell biologic, transcriptomic and proteomic approaches both in vitro using coculture model of BE with BSM cells and ex vivo using patients’ biopsies. BE cells were cultured and differentiated in air-liquid interface. RV particle number within BE cells was measured using digital PCR. Proteomic and transcriptomic data were analyzed using IPA (Qiagen). Cytokines concentrations in the supernatant were assessed using ELISA assays. Finally, PkR pathway was analyzed by western blotting. Severe asthmatic patients were similar to control subjects in terms of sex ratio, age and BMI. Not surprisingly asthmatic patients presented a lower FEV-1. We found that asthmatic BSM cells co-cultured with BE cells increased RV replication and level of IL6 in the supernatant compare to that co-cultured with control BSM cells. Large scaled proteomic and transcriptomic analysis highlighted CCL-20 production by asthmatic BSM cells, as a potential candidate to specifically increase the RV infection of the BE cells. Blocking CCL-20 in the co-culture supernatant with asthmatic BSM cells reduced the number of RV particles within the BE cells. Moreover, such a co-culture decreased the PkR pathway activation after RV infection. Indeed, we showed a decreased level of the activated form of PkR and eIF2-alpha. Finally, a direct stimulation of BE cells with CCL-20 reproduced both the increased number of RV particles and the down-regulation of the PkR pathway. In conclusion, these results clearly demonstrated that asthmatic BSM increased the BE response to RV, through an increase of CCL-20 production by BSM, which in turn, down-regulated PKR response of the BE leading to increase RV replication and particles number in BE. To the best of our knowledge, it is the very first time that such a direct bottom-up effect of asthmatic BSM on BE has been demonstrated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症哮喘患者支气管平滑肌通过CCL-20/PkR/ eif2α依赖途径减少鼻病毒在上皮内的复制
支气管上皮(BE)的病毒感染,特别是鼻病毒(RV)与绝大多数严重哮喘发作有关。预防这些恶化仍然是一项未得到满足的重大需求。严重哮喘的支气管重塑以支气管平滑肌(BSM)质量增加为特征,这具有较差的预后价值,因为较高的BSM质量与加重的恶化率相关。然而,哮喘性BSM在BE RV感染中的作用从未得到证实。因此,我们假设哮喘性BSM增加了BE易感性和对RV感染的反应。然后,我们从COBRA队列中招募了19名严重哮喘患者和37名对照受试者。我们设计了细胞生物学、转录组学和蛋白质组学方法,在体外使用BE与BSM细胞共培养模型,在体外使用患者活检。BE细胞在气液界面培养分化。采用数字PCR法测定BE细胞内RV颗粒数。采用IPA (Qiagen)分析蛋白质组学和转录组学数据。用ELISA法测定上清液中细胞因子的浓度。最后用western blotting分析PkR通路。重度哮喘患者在性别比例、年龄和BMI方面与对照组相似。毫不奇怪,哮喘患者表现出较低的FEV-1。我们发现与BE细胞共培养的哮喘BSM细胞比与对照BSM细胞共培养的哮喘BSM细胞上清中RV复制和IL6水平增加。大规模的蛋白质组学和转录组学分析表明,哮喘BSM细胞产生的CCL-20可能会特异性地增加BE细胞的RV感染。在哮喘BSM细胞共培养上清中阻断CCL-20可减少BE细胞内RV颗粒的数量。此外,这种共培养降低了RV感染后PkR通路的激活。事实上,我们发现PkR和eif2 - α的激活形式水平下降。最后,用CCL-20直接刺激BE细胞,可以复制RV颗粒数量的增加和PkR通路的下调。综上所述,这些结果清楚地表明,哮喘BSM通过增加BSM的CCL-20产生来增加BE对RV的反应,进而降低BE的PKR反应,导致BE中RV的复制和颗粒数量增加。据我们所知,这是第一次证明哮喘性BSM对BE的直接自下而上的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bronchial Smooth Muscle of Severe Asthmatic Patients Decreases Rhinovirus Replication Within the Epithelium Through a CCL-20/PkR/eIF2alpha-Dependent Pathway Intestinal Commensal Bacteria Promote AT2 Self-Renewal and AT1 Differentiation in an IL-22 Dependent Fashion and Prepare the Newborn to Fight Potentially Fatal Respiratory Pathogens Interferon Lambda Signaling in Macrophages Is Necessary for the Antiviral Response to Influenza
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1