Serum biochemical changes and growth response study following probiotic and phytobiotic supplementation in broiler chickens

Md. Moshiur Rahman, Md. Mustafijur Rahman Ripon, Md. Shafiul Arefin, Md. Faisal Ferdous, Md. Harunur Rashid, A. Sani, Mst. Rokeya Sultana, Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain, M. U. Ahammad, K. Rafiq
{"title":"Serum biochemical changes and growth response study following probiotic and phytobiotic supplementation in broiler chickens","authors":"Md. Moshiur Rahman, Md. Mustafijur Rahman Ripon, Md. Shafiul Arefin, Md. Faisal Ferdous, Md. Harunur Rashid, A. Sani, Mst. Rokeya Sultana, Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain, M. U. Ahammad, K. Rafiq","doi":"10.3329/aajbb.v4i1.64867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many alternative substances have been investigated for their potential to replace antibiotics as growth promoters. Probiotics and phytobiotics are some of the products that can be used as growth promoters in broiler. The present study was designed to investigate either single or combined effect of a probiotic and phytobiotic on serum bio-chemistry and growth performances in broilers. A total of 50 Cobb-500 day old chicks were divided into five groups (10 birds each). The birds of Group A were offered a basal diet (corn-soya based), Group B basal diet + 0.10% Renamycin 100®, Group C basal diet + 0.15% probiotic (Bio-Top®), Group D basal diet + 0.10% phytobiotic (Galibiotic) and Group E basal diet + 0.15% Bio-Top® + 0.10% Galibiotic. Body weight, feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and serum bio-chemistry (Triglyceride, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, ALT, AST, creatinine) were recorded. Serum biochemical values differed significantly (P<0.05) among the groups. The average final live weight gain was 665grams, 686grams, 1095grams, 780grams and 1065grams in groups A, B, C, D and E, respectively. The feed conversion ratio was 2.1, 1.96, 1.72, 1.83, and 1.75 in A, B, C, D and E group, respectively. The present study revealed that supplementation of probiotic and phytobiotic in feed significantly reduced triglyceride, cholesterol and HDL values compared to value of control group (P<0.05). Probiotic or its’ combination with phytobiotic has the potential to be exemplary alternatives to antibiotic as growth promoters. \nAsian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2019, 4 (1), 1-6","PeriodicalId":184754,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/aajbb.v4i1.64867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many alternative substances have been investigated for their potential to replace antibiotics as growth promoters. Probiotics and phytobiotics are some of the products that can be used as growth promoters in broiler. The present study was designed to investigate either single or combined effect of a probiotic and phytobiotic on serum bio-chemistry and growth performances in broilers. A total of 50 Cobb-500 day old chicks were divided into five groups (10 birds each). The birds of Group A were offered a basal diet (corn-soya based), Group B basal diet + 0.10% Renamycin 100®, Group C basal diet + 0.15% probiotic (Bio-Top®), Group D basal diet + 0.10% phytobiotic (Galibiotic) and Group E basal diet + 0.15% Bio-Top® + 0.10% Galibiotic. Body weight, feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and serum bio-chemistry (Triglyceride, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, ALT, AST, creatinine) were recorded. Serum biochemical values differed significantly (P<0.05) among the groups. The average final live weight gain was 665grams, 686grams, 1095grams, 780grams and 1065grams in groups A, B, C, D and E, respectively. The feed conversion ratio was 2.1, 1.96, 1.72, 1.83, and 1.75 in A, B, C, D and E group, respectively. The present study revealed that supplementation of probiotic and phytobiotic in feed significantly reduced triglyceride, cholesterol and HDL values compared to value of control group (P<0.05). Probiotic or its’ combination with phytobiotic has the potential to be exemplary alternatives to antibiotic as growth promoters. Asian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2019, 4 (1), 1-6
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加益生菌和植物制剂后肉鸡血清生化变化及生长响应研究
人们已经研究了许多替代物质,以寻找它们作为生长促进剂取代抗生素的潜力。益生菌和植物性益生菌是一些可以在肉鸡中用作生长促进剂的产品。本试验旨在研究一种益生菌和植物制剂单独或联合使用对肉鸡血清生化和生长性能的影响。选取50只cobb ~ 500日龄雏鸡,分为5组,每组10只。A组饲喂基础饲粮(以玉米-大豆为基础)、B组基础饲粮+ 0.10%的瑞那霉素100®、C组基础饲粮+ 0.15%的益生菌(Bio-Top®)、D组基础饲粮+ 0.10%的植物益生菌(galibio)和E组基础饲粮+ 0.15%的Bio-Top®+ 0.10%的galibio。记录体重、采食量、增重、饲料系数(FCR)和血清生化指标(甘油三酯、胆固醇、LDL、HDL、ALT、AST、肌酐)。各组间血清生化指标差异显著(P<0.05)。A组、B组、C组、D组和E组的平均最终活增重分别为665克、686克、1095克、780克和1065克。A、B、C、D和E组的饲料系数分别为2.1、1.96、1.72、1.83和1.75。本研究发现,与对照组相比,饲料中添加益生菌和植物制剂显著降低了甘油三酯、胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)值(P<0.05)。益生菌或其与植物菌的组合有可能成为抗生素的典型替代品,作为生长促进剂。亚洲Australas。j . Biosci。生物技术,2019,4 (1),1-6
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Embracing diversity in bioscience and biotechnology as a path towards innovation and progress Bacterial wilt of tobacco in Bangladesh: a pilot study for assessment of the status, detection of seed-borne nature and genetic variation of its pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum DNA barcoding and phylogenetic relationships of ten butterfly caterpillars Population distribution and breeding practices of livestock in different districts of Bangladesh Degradation of selected organophosphorus pesticide residues and their pre harvest interval determination in hyacinth bean grown commercially in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1