Totally Different and yet so Alike: Three Concepts to Use Scrum in Higher Education

Marco Klopp, Carolin Gold-Veerkamp, J. Abke, K. Borgeest, R. Reuter, Sabrina Jahn, J. Mottok, Yvonne Sedelmaier, Alexander Lehmann, D. Landes
{"title":"Totally Different and yet so Alike: Three Concepts to Use Scrum in Higher Education","authors":"Marco Klopp, Carolin Gold-Veerkamp, J. Abke, K. Borgeest, R. Reuter, Sabrina Jahn, J. Mottok, Yvonne Sedelmaier, Alexander Lehmann, D. Landes","doi":"10.1145/3396802.3396817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software process models are important in software projects in order to give the work of a project guidelines or a framework. However, teaching process models in higher education seems to be quite challenging. This has to do with the fact that undergraduates have no experience with projects in which process models are used. The theoretical mediation of process models is initially on a very abstract level. For this reason, we chose to combine two didactic approaches, namely problem-based learning and project work. Various traditional plan-driven process models have been expanded in courses in Software Engineering with agile process models. The Scrum Framework is the focus of consideration of this paper. Three Universities of Applied Sciences which cooperate in the EVELIN project focused on Scrum as a process model and integrated it into their teaching. Since the respective concepts of implementation differ, they should be presented and compared in this article to presents some practice approaches. The goal of this presentation of is a uniform evaluation in order to obtain insights from different perspectives. This comparison can draw conclusions for possible necessary improvements of the respective concepts.","PeriodicalId":277576,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Software Engineering Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Software Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396802.3396817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Software process models are important in software projects in order to give the work of a project guidelines or a framework. However, teaching process models in higher education seems to be quite challenging. This has to do with the fact that undergraduates have no experience with projects in which process models are used. The theoretical mediation of process models is initially on a very abstract level. For this reason, we chose to combine two didactic approaches, namely problem-based learning and project work. Various traditional plan-driven process models have been expanded in courses in Software Engineering with agile process models. The Scrum Framework is the focus of consideration of this paper. Three Universities of Applied Sciences which cooperate in the EVELIN project focused on Scrum as a process model and integrated it into their teaching. Since the respective concepts of implementation differ, they should be presented and compared in this article to presents some practice approaches. The goal of this presentation of is a uniform evaluation in order to obtain insights from different perspectives. This comparison can draw conclusions for possible necessary improvements of the respective concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完全不同却又如此相似:在高等教育中使用Scrum的三个概念
软件过程模型在软件项目中非常重要,因为它为项目工作提供了指导方针或框架。然而,高等教育教学过程模型似乎颇具挑战性。这与本科生没有使用过程模型的项目经验这一事实有关。过程模型的理论中介最初是在一个非常抽象的层面上。因此,我们选择结合两种教学方法,即基于问题的学习和项目工作。在软件工程课程中,各种传统的计划驱动过程模型已经用敏捷过程模型进行了扩展。Scrum框架是本文考虑的重点。在EVELIN项目中合作的三所应用科学大学将Scrum作为一种过程模型,并将其整合到他们的教学中。由于各自的实现概念不同,因此本文应该对它们进行介绍和比较,以介绍一些实践方法。本演讲的目的是统一评价,以便从不同的角度获得见解。这种比较可以得出结论,可能需要改进各自的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tool-Aided Assessment of Difficulties in Learning Formal Design-by-Contract Assertions Teaching cooperative problem solving Towards the Automation of Grading Textual Student Submissions to Open-ended Questions Totally Different and yet so Alike: Three Concepts to Use Scrum in Higher Education Motivating Adult Learners by Introducing Programming Concepts with Scratch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1