The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medical Imaging: Systematic Literature Review

Lamija Hafizović, Aldijana Čaušević, Amar Deumic, L. S. Becirovic, L. G. Pokvic, A. Badnjević
{"title":"The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medical Imaging: Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Lamija Hafizović, Aldijana Čaušević, Amar Deumic, L. S. Becirovic, L. G. Pokvic, A. Badnjević","doi":"10.1109/BIBE52308.2021.9635307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diagnostic medical imaging and the interpretation of the imaging results pose a great challenge for the medical profession as the final conclusions are highly susceptible to human error and subjectivity. The necessity for standardization of interpretation of medical images is very necessary to bypass these problems. The only way of achieving this is using a methodology which excludes the human eye and employs artificial intelligence. However, another challenge is selecting the most suitable AI algorithm fit for the challenging task of imaging results interpretation. This study was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines published in 2020. Research was done using PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases where the key inclusion criteria were language, journal credibility, open access to full-text publications and the most recent papers. In order to focus on only the most recent research, only the papers published in the last 5 years were evaluated. The search through PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar has yielded 81, 205, and 520 papers respectively. Out of this number of papers, 26 of them have met all of the inclusion criteria and were included in the research. The observed accuracies of the models and the overall rising interest in the topic denote that this field is rapidly growing and has a great potential to be applied in daily medical practice in the future.","PeriodicalId":343724,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE52308.2021.9635307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Diagnostic medical imaging and the interpretation of the imaging results pose a great challenge for the medical profession as the final conclusions are highly susceptible to human error and subjectivity. The necessity for standardization of interpretation of medical images is very necessary to bypass these problems. The only way of achieving this is using a methodology which excludes the human eye and employs artificial intelligence. However, another challenge is selecting the most suitable AI algorithm fit for the challenging task of imaging results interpretation. This study was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines published in 2020. Research was done using PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases where the key inclusion criteria were language, journal credibility, open access to full-text publications and the most recent papers. In order to focus on only the most recent research, only the papers published in the last 5 years were evaluated. The search through PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar has yielded 81, 205, and 520 papers respectively. Out of this number of papers, 26 of them have met all of the inclusion criteria and were included in the research. The observed accuracies of the models and the overall rising interest in the topic denote that this field is rapidly growing and has a great potential to be applied in daily medical practice in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在医学影像诊断中的应用:系统文献综述
诊断医学成像和成像结果的解释对医学界提出了巨大的挑战,因为最终结论极易受到人为错误和主观性的影响。为了绕过这些问题,医学图像解释的标准化是非常必要的。实现这一目标的唯一途径是使用一种排除人眼并使用人工智能的方法。然而,另一个挑战是选择最适合的人工智能算法来完成具有挑战性的成像结果解释任务。本研究是根据2020年发布的PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行的。研究使用PubMed, ScienceDirect和Google Scholar数据库完成,其中关键的纳入标准是语言,期刊可信度,全文出版物的开放获取和最新论文。为了只关注最新的研究,只评估了最近5年发表的论文。通过PubMed、ScienceDirect和Google Scholar进行的搜索分别得出了81篇、205篇和520篇论文。在这些论文中,有26篇符合所有纳入标准,被纳入本研究。观察到的模型的准确性和对该主题的整体兴趣的增加表明,该领域正在迅速发展,并且在未来的日常医疗实践中具有巨大的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural, antimicrobial, and molecular docking study of 3-(1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)amino) ethylidene)chroman-2,4-dione and its corresponding Pd complex Multiple-Activation Parallel Convolution Network in Combination with t-SNE for the Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment Analyzing the Impact of Resampling Approaches on Chest X-Ray Images for COVID-19 Identification in a Local Hierarchical Classification Scenario Analysis of knee joint forces in different types of jumps of top futsal players at the beginning and at the end of the preparation period Design and evaluation of a noninvasive tongue-computer interface for individuals with severe disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1