The Instrumentalisation of the Right to Reparation and Dealing with the Past between Germany and Poland

S. Klein
{"title":"The Instrumentalisation of the Right to Reparation and Dealing with the Past between Germany and Poland","authors":"S. Klein","doi":"10.35757/rpn.2022.30.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dealing with the past is an essential part of transitional justice. It combines the four main pillars: the right to know, the right to justice, the right to reparation, and the guarantee of non-recurrence. Dealing with the past indicates that a significant amount of time has passed since the crime and injustice. Therefore, the problem of forgetting and modifying history deliberately or unconsciously forms the core of the instrumentalisation of dealing with the past. On the one hand, unconscious forgetting or modifying is usually the result of a non-responsible educational system (youth and adult education); on the other hand, deliberate modification of the past is driven by the desire to reach an aim which morally cannot be supported by its measures. One can observe governmental desire to modify and therefore instrumentalise history to secure the government’s power, divert attention from domestic issues and thus shape national pride/patriotism which is built on a selective historical memory. This article highlights the development of German and Polish relationships in the context of reparations for World War II and a selective history spread by the German movement called ‘Prussian Claims Society’ that fights, using selective Nazi analogies, to reclaim former German property from Poland represented by the Polish government. The movement also wants to create a selective history to divert attention from the national separation of the population. The aim of the article is to show how Germans and Poles handle the topic of reparations for World War II.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35757/rpn.2022.30.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dealing with the past is an essential part of transitional justice. It combines the four main pillars: the right to know, the right to justice, the right to reparation, and the guarantee of non-recurrence. Dealing with the past indicates that a significant amount of time has passed since the crime and injustice. Therefore, the problem of forgetting and modifying history deliberately or unconsciously forms the core of the instrumentalisation of dealing with the past. On the one hand, unconscious forgetting or modifying is usually the result of a non-responsible educational system (youth and adult education); on the other hand, deliberate modification of the past is driven by the desire to reach an aim which morally cannot be supported by its measures. One can observe governmental desire to modify and therefore instrumentalise history to secure the government’s power, divert attention from domestic issues and thus shape national pride/patriotism which is built on a selective historical memory. This article highlights the development of German and Polish relationships in the context of reparations for World War II and a selective history spread by the German movement called ‘Prussian Claims Society’ that fights, using selective Nazi analogies, to reclaim former German property from Poland represented by the Polish government. The movement also wants to create a selective history to divert attention from the national separation of the population. The aim of the article is to show how Germans and Poles handle the topic of reparations for World War II.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国与波兰之间赔偿权利的工具化与对过去的处理
处理过去是过渡时期司法的一个重要组成部分。它结合了四个主要支柱:知情权、诉诸司法的权利、获得赔偿的权利和保证不再发生。处理过去表明犯罪和不公正已经过去了相当长的一段时间。因此,有意或无意地忘记和修改历史的问题构成了处理过去的工具化的核心。一方面,无意识的遗忘或修改通常是不负责任的教育制度(青年和成人教育)的结果;另一方面,对过去的刻意修改是被一种愿望所驱使的,这种愿望是为了达到一个在道德上无法得到其措施支持的目标。人们可以观察到,政府希望修改历史,从而将历史工具化,以确保政府的权力,转移人们对国内问题的注意力,从而塑造建立在选择性历史记忆之上的民族自豪感/爱国主义。本文强调了德国和波兰关系在二战赔款背景下的发展,以及德国“普鲁士索赔协会”运动传播的选择性历史,该运动使用选择性的纳粹类比,从波兰政府代表的波兰收回前德国财产。该运动还希望创造一个选择性的历史,以转移人们对民族分离的关注。这篇文章的目的是展示德国人和波兰人如何处理第二次世界大战赔款问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Historycznoprawne spojrzenie na ludobójstwo narodu polskiego Obraz polskiej rzeczywistości po wrześniu 1939 r. w prasie gadzinowej Dobra kultury z terenów Polski Zachodniej na tle dyskusji o polskich stratach wojennych W kierunku państwa przyjaznego migrantom – polityka imigracyjna niemieckiego rządu w 2022 roku “Thank You, Your Putin Has Already Congratulated Us”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1