Impact of Middle Term Points in Total Score in the Context of Face to Face and Online Teaching

Nazmi Xhomara, M. Hala
{"title":"Impact of Middle Term Points in Total Score in the Context of Face to Face and Online Teaching","authors":"Nazmi Xhomara, M. Hala","doi":"10.26417/623qdp44g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to investigate the differences between face-to-face and online teaching, as well as the effect of middle term points in total score in the context of face-to-face and online teaching. Correlational research design and a database of students’ attendance and results to get secondary data were used in the study. A random cluster sample of students from the bachelor's degree program was taken. The study demonstrated that there is a mean difference in the population or, equivalently, that the two-sample means were drawn from different populations of online vs face-to-face teaching. The study showed a high positive correlation between middle term points and total score variables, r = .846 for the experimental group and r = .731 for the control group, where increases in middle term points were associated with increases in total score values. It can also be concluded that the total variance of total score levels explained by middle term points (the model) is 53.4%, the other variance may be explained by other variables; meanwhile, Beta Standardized coefficient of middle term points explains 84.6% of the variance in the total score of their academic performance for the experimental group and 73.1% for the control group. This indicates that middle term points influence strongly the total score of students' academic performance.","PeriodicalId":432313,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Science Education and Research","volume":"515 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Science Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/623qdp44g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the differences between face-to-face and online teaching, as well as the effect of middle term points in total score in the context of face-to-face and online teaching. Correlational research design and a database of students’ attendance and results to get secondary data were used in the study. A random cluster sample of students from the bachelor's degree program was taken. The study demonstrated that there is a mean difference in the population or, equivalently, that the two-sample means were drawn from different populations of online vs face-to-face teaching. The study showed a high positive correlation between middle term points and total score variables, r = .846 for the experimental group and r = .731 for the control group, where increases in middle term points were associated with increases in total score values. It can also be concluded that the total variance of total score levels explained by middle term points (the model) is 53.4%, the other variance may be explained by other variables; meanwhile, Beta Standardized coefficient of middle term points explains 84.6% of the variance in the total score of their academic performance for the experimental group and 73.1% for the control group. This indicates that middle term points influence strongly the total score of students' academic performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面授与网络教学情境下中期分对总分的影响
本研究旨在探讨面对面教学与网络教学的差异,以及在面对面教学和网络教学的背景下,中期分在总分中的影响。本研究采用相关研究设计,并以学生出勤率及成绩数据库作为辅助资料。从学士学位课程的学生中随机抽取一组样本。该研究表明,总体上有一个平均差异,或者等价地说,两个样本的平均值是从不同的在线和面对面教学人群中抽取的。研究显示中期分与总分变量之间存在高度正相关,实验组的r = 0.846,对照组的r = 0.731,中期分的增加与总分值的增加相关。还可以得出,由中期点(模型)解释的总得分水平的总方差为53.4%,其他方差可能由其他变量解释;同时,中期分的Beta标准化系数解释了实验组学生学业成绩总分方差的84.6%,对照组学生学业成绩总分方差的73.1%。这说明期中分数对学生学业成绩的总分影响很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficiency of Online Learning and Difficulties Encountered. Case of Albanian Students Winning Prescription Without Title of State Property Motivation, A Key Booster for Teachers’ Performance: a Case Study on Public Schools in North Macedonia Inheritance and the Role of Notaries in Inheritance Procedure in the Republic of North Macedonia Analysis of Ismail Kadare Prose Prospects Under the Optics of V. L. Propp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1