The Key to the Economic and Socio-Political Fallacies of Marxism

M. Asatryan
{"title":"The Key to the Economic and Socio-Political Fallacies of Marxism","authors":"M. Asatryan","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL20138193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union and a radical return to capitalism (which was unprecedented for the human history), and wild capitalism at that, the global social and political sciences found themselves in the position of French historians of the Restoration epoch who sought to identify the true causes of the Great French Revolution and of subsequent events. Since the struggle for communism for the world over was launched under the banner of Marxism, the defeat of the global system of socialism on the global scale posed the following cardinal question for social and political scientists: if Marx's doctrine is true, why was the end of the global socialism so inglorious? If, however, the doctrine was not true, why wasn't it refuted so fundamentally as to rule out any objections on the part of Marxist-Leninists? Twenty two years have passed after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the global system of socialism and the end of the Cold War, feelings have calmed down and it seems like it is high time to tackle this question in a calm and impartial fashion without unnecessary emotions. Generally speaking, failure of any scientific or scholarly theory can be an outcome of two main causes, viz. of the theory itself or of its practical application being fallacious or of the combination of both. That mistakes, including serious ones, were made in the process of application of Marxism is not denied even by present-day Communists. Suffice it to say that communist rulers were not, in fact, communists in terms of their cast of mind and of way of life. Marxism for them was a cash cow, which was supposed to provide them with power and the life of privilege, including magnificent apartments and summer houses, luxury cars, special supply centers, etc. Now new communists, the likes of Zyuganov, Ampilov, Chavez, etc. promise to correct mistakes of the past and again urge people to launch struggle this time for genuine Socialism and Communism. Thus, the ground is being forged for revanche, and first gains are present already. Venezuela embarked recently on the communist road, followed by Nepal. A communist was elected as a President of Cyprus. China's might is rapidly growing. China has become the second largest economy of the world and has been pursuing NEP (New Economic Policy) in Lenin's style--in earnest and for a long period of time. It is expected that the NEP will pave the way to mighty socialist China. The global community, and first of all the US, already perceive the growing global threat posed by China as it will result in unpredictable shift in the balance of power in the world. The threat of Marxist socialist ideas becomes even more serious with the growth of anti-capitalist sentiment in the West following the recent financial crisis that triggered a significant increase in unemployment and the protest movement \"Occupy Wall Street.\" Western media report that Marx's Das Kapital enjoys considerable popularity as its sales have tripled. It follows then that despite its retreat, Communism still has huge ideological and military-political resources, as communist govern twenty percent of the global population. The international rating of founder of the \"scientific communism\" Karl Marx is still very high. In the 1999 internet-based public opinion poll conducted by BBC, Marx was named the greatest thinker of the second millennium, as he topped the list of the humanity's ten men of genius. At present, the Communist theoreticians and leaders defend Marxism by contending that its subsequent failures and downfall can be accounted for by mistakes made in the course of its practical implementation. They take advantage of the fact that Marxism was not refuted fundamentally. Therefore the following questions: \"Practical mistakes cannot be disregarded but are they the only problem? Doesn't the Marxist theory itself have fundamental fallacies?\" becomes crucially significant. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL20138193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union and a radical return to capitalism (which was unprecedented for the human history), and wild capitalism at that, the global social and political sciences found themselves in the position of French historians of the Restoration epoch who sought to identify the true causes of the Great French Revolution and of subsequent events. Since the struggle for communism for the world over was launched under the banner of Marxism, the defeat of the global system of socialism on the global scale posed the following cardinal question for social and political scientists: if Marx's doctrine is true, why was the end of the global socialism so inglorious? If, however, the doctrine was not true, why wasn't it refuted so fundamentally as to rule out any objections on the part of Marxist-Leninists? Twenty two years have passed after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the global system of socialism and the end of the Cold War, feelings have calmed down and it seems like it is high time to tackle this question in a calm and impartial fashion without unnecessary emotions. Generally speaking, failure of any scientific or scholarly theory can be an outcome of two main causes, viz. of the theory itself or of its practical application being fallacious or of the combination of both. That mistakes, including serious ones, were made in the process of application of Marxism is not denied even by present-day Communists. Suffice it to say that communist rulers were not, in fact, communists in terms of their cast of mind and of way of life. Marxism for them was a cash cow, which was supposed to provide them with power and the life of privilege, including magnificent apartments and summer houses, luxury cars, special supply centers, etc. Now new communists, the likes of Zyuganov, Ampilov, Chavez, etc. promise to correct mistakes of the past and again urge people to launch struggle this time for genuine Socialism and Communism. Thus, the ground is being forged for revanche, and first gains are present already. Venezuela embarked recently on the communist road, followed by Nepal. A communist was elected as a President of Cyprus. China's might is rapidly growing. China has become the second largest economy of the world and has been pursuing NEP (New Economic Policy) in Lenin's style--in earnest and for a long period of time. It is expected that the NEP will pave the way to mighty socialist China. The global community, and first of all the US, already perceive the growing global threat posed by China as it will result in unpredictable shift in the balance of power in the world. The threat of Marxist socialist ideas becomes even more serious with the growth of anti-capitalist sentiment in the West following the recent financial crisis that triggered a significant increase in unemployment and the protest movement "Occupy Wall Street." Western media report that Marx's Das Kapital enjoys considerable popularity as its sales have tripled. It follows then that despite its retreat, Communism still has huge ideological and military-political resources, as communist govern twenty percent of the global population. The international rating of founder of the "scientific communism" Karl Marx is still very high. In the 1999 internet-based public opinion poll conducted by BBC, Marx was named the greatest thinker of the second millennium, as he topped the list of the humanity's ten men of genius. At present, the Communist theoreticians and leaders defend Marxism by contending that its subsequent failures and downfall can be accounted for by mistakes made in the course of its practical implementation. They take advantage of the fact that Marxism was not refuted fundamentally. Therefore the following questions: "Practical mistakes cannot be disregarded but are they the only problem? Doesn't the Marxist theory itself have fundamental fallacies?" becomes crucially significant. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马克思主义经济谬误和社会政治谬误的关键
在苏联突然解体和资本主义的激进回归(这在人类历史上是前所未有的),以及野蛮的资本主义之后,全球社会和政治科学发现自己处于法国复辟时期的历史学家的位置,他们试图确定法国大革命及其后续事件的真正原因。既然全世界的共产主义斗争都是在马克思主义的旗帜下展开的,那么全球社会主义体系在全球范围内的失败,就给社会和政治学家提出了以下主要问题:如果马克思的学说是正确的,为什么全球社会主义的终结如此不光彩?然而,如果这个学说不是真的,为什么没有从根本上驳倒它,从而排除马列主义者的任何反对意见呢?苏联解体、全球社会主义体系瓦解、冷战结束已经过去了22年,人们的感情已经平静下来,似乎是时候冷静、公正地处理这个问题了,不要有不必要的情绪。一般来说,任何科学或学术理论的失败可能是两个主要原因的结果,即理论本身或其实际应用是错误的,或两者的结合。在应用马克思主义的过程中犯过错误,包括严重的错误,这一点,就是现在的共产党人也不否认。我只想说,从思想和生活方式的角度来看,共产主义统治者实际上并不是共产主义者。马克思主义对他们来说是一棵摇钱树,它应该为他们提供权力和特权生活,包括豪华公寓和避暑别墅,豪华汽车,特殊供应中心等。现在新的共产主义者,如久加诺夫、安皮洛夫、查韦斯等人承诺纠正过去的错误,并再次敦促人们为真正的社会主义和共产主义而斗争。因此,复仇的基础正在形成,第一批成果已经出现。委内瑞拉最近走上了共产主义道路,尼泊尔紧随其后。一位共产主义者被选为塞浦路斯总统。中国的实力正在迅速增长。中国已经成为世界第二大经济体,并长期认真地奉行列宁式的新经济政策。预计新经济政策将为强大的社会主义中国铺平道路。国际社会,首先是美国,已经意识到中国构成的日益增长的全球威胁,因为它将导致世界力量平衡的不可预测的变化。最近的金融危机引发了失业率的大幅上升和“占领华尔街”抗议运动,随着西方反资本主义情绪的增长,马克思主义社会主义思想的威胁变得更加严重。西方媒体报道说,马克思的《资本论》的销量增加了两倍,受到了相当大的欢迎。因此,尽管共产主义退却了,但它仍然拥有巨大的意识形态和军事政治资源,因为共产主义统治着全球20%的人口。“科学共产主义”创始人卡尔·马克思的国际评价仍然很高。在1999年英国广播公司进行的网络民意调查中,马克思被评为第二个千年最伟大的思想家,他被评为人类十大天才。目前,共产党的理论家和领导人为马克思主义辩护,认为它后来的失败和垮台可以解释为它在实际实施过程中所犯的错误。他们利用了马克思主义没有被根本驳倒的事实。因此,下面的问题是:“不能忽视实际错误,但它们是唯一的问题吗?”难道马克思主义理论本身就没有根本谬误吗?”变得至关重要。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emily Dickinson: What Is Called Thinking at the Edge of Chaos? Relational Selves: Gender and Cultural Differences in Moral Reasoning Late Pound: The Case of Canto CVII The Reproduction of Subjectivity and the Turnover-time of Ideology: Speculating with German Idealism, Marx, and Adorno Toward an Ethics of Speculative Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1