Donor Intention and Dialectic Legal Policy Frames

J. Picton
{"title":"Donor Intention and Dialectic Legal Policy Frames","authors":"J. Picton","doi":"10.4337/9781785369995.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is a widely held view that the cy-pres process has fidelity to the donor’s intention at its heart, policy concerns are in fact the main priority of the courts. This was true during the development of the doctrine, and it remains true in the present day. Linking historic precedent to the contemporary law, this chapter identifies shifting legal policy treatments of intention in relation to cy-pres as it evolves over time. It uses two theoretical tools — dialectics and framing — in order to make the critical claim that where courts pay attention to donor intention in the cy-pres reform process, they do so in a manner which is both coloured by and secondary to wider policy concerns.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785369995.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there is a widely held view that the cy-pres process has fidelity to the donor’s intention at its heart, policy concerns are in fact the main priority of the courts. This was true during the development of the doctrine, and it remains true in the present day. Linking historic precedent to the contemporary law, this chapter identifies shifting legal policy treatments of intention in relation to cy-pres as it evolves over time. It uses two theoretical tools — dialectics and framing — in order to make the critical claim that where courts pay attention to donor intention in the cy-pres reform process, they do so in a manner which is both coloured by and secondary to wider policy concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捐赠意向与辩证法法律政策框架
虽然人们普遍认为,货币兑换程序的核心是忠实于捐助者的意图,但政策问题实际上是法院的主要优先事项。这在学说的发展过程中是正确的,在今天仍然是正确的。本章将历史先例与当代法律联系起来,确定了随着时间的推移,与cy- press相关的意图的法律政策处理的变化。它使用了两种理论工具- -辩证法和框架- -以便提出关键的主张,即当法院在货币改革过程中注意捐助者的意图时,它们这样做的方式既受到更广泛的政策问题的影响,又从属于更广泛的政策问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pith and Marrow is Dead… Long Live Pith and Marrow: The Doctrine of Equivalents After Actavis THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling The Internal Market: An Historical Perspective AI in the Boardroom: Let the Law be in the Driving Seat Back to School - and After
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1