THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling

Ganesh Rajgopalan
{"title":"THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling","authors":"Ganesh Rajgopalan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3897521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxation of software payments as royalties has been a vexed issue worldwide. The controversy has been settled to some extent by the Supreme Court in India but that ruling has also thrown up new controversies for future litigation. A fresh attempt by the Australian tax authorities to characterise software payments as royalties is interesting but not without problems. This piece deals with the understanding of the exclusive rights available to a copyright owner under the Australian Copyright Act, 1968 and the impact that should have while ascertaining the characterisation of software payments under the ITAA 1936. The conclusions drawn also should apply to interpret the meaning of the term royalties in double tax avoidance agreements. The write up is based on the submissions made by the author to the ATO in response to the Draft Ruling.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxation of software payments as royalties has been a vexed issue worldwide. The controversy has been settled to some extent by the Supreme Court in India but that ruling has also thrown up new controversies for future litigation. A fresh attempt by the Australian tax authorities to characterise software payments as royalties is interesting but not without problems. This piece deals with the understanding of the exclusive rights available to a copyright owner under the Australian Copyright Act, 1968 and the impact that should have while ascertaining the characterisation of software payments under the ITAA 1936. The conclusions drawn also should apply to interpret the meaning of the term royalties in double tax avoidance agreements. The write up is based on the submissions made by the author to the ATO in response to the Draft Ruling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ATO TR 2021/D4 -软件支付作为特许权使用费的征税-对裁决草案的评论
以版税形式对软件支付进行征税一直是全世界都在争论的问题。印度最高法院在一定程度上解决了这一争议,但这一裁决也为未来的诉讼带来了新的争议。澳大利亚税务当局将软件支付定性为版税的新尝试很有趣,但并非没有问题。这篇文章涉及对1968年澳大利亚版权法下版权所有者的专有权的理解,以及在确定ITAA 1936下软件支付的特征时应该产生的影响。所得结论也应适用于解释避免双重征税协定中特许权使用费一词的含义。这篇文章是基于作者在回应裁决草案时向ATO提交的意见书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pith and Marrow is Dead… Long Live Pith and Marrow: The Doctrine of Equivalents After Actavis THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling The Internal Market: An Historical Perspective AI in the Boardroom: Let the Law be in the Driving Seat Back to School - and After
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1