On the ecological validity of a password study

S. Fahl, M. Harbach, Y. Acar, Matthew Smith
{"title":"On the ecological validity of a password study","authors":"S. Fahl, M. Harbach, Y. Acar, Matthew Smith","doi":"10.1145/2501604.2501617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ecological validity of password studies is a complex topic and difficult to quantify. Most researchers who conduct password user studies try to address the issue in their study design. However, the methods researchers use to try to improve ecological validity vary and some methods even contradict each other. One reason for this is that the very nature of the problem of ecological validity of password studies is hard to study, due to the lack of ground truth. In this paper, we present a study on the ecological validity of password studies designed specifically to shed light on this issue. We were able to compare the behavior of 645 study participants with their real world password choices. We conducted both online and laboratory studies, under priming and non-priming conditions, to be able to evaluate the effects of these different forms of password studies. While our study is able to investigate only one specific password environment used by a limited population and thus cannot answer all questions about ecological validity, it does represent a first important step in judging the impact of ecological validity on password studies.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"117","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2501604.2501617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117

Abstract

The ecological validity of password studies is a complex topic and difficult to quantify. Most researchers who conduct password user studies try to address the issue in their study design. However, the methods researchers use to try to improve ecological validity vary and some methods even contradict each other. One reason for this is that the very nature of the problem of ecological validity of password studies is hard to study, due to the lack of ground truth. In this paper, we present a study on the ecological validity of password studies designed specifically to shed light on this issue. We were able to compare the behavior of 645 study participants with their real world password choices. We conducted both online and laboratory studies, under priming and non-priming conditions, to be able to evaluate the effects of these different forms of password studies. While our study is able to investigate only one specific password environment used by a limited population and thus cannot answer all questions about ecological validity, it does represent a first important step in judging the impact of ecological validity on password studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论密码研究的生态效度
密码研究的生态效度是一个复杂且难以量化的课题。大多数进行密码用户研究的研究人员试图在他们的研究设计中解决这个问题。然而,研究人员试图提高生态效度的方法各不相同,有些方法甚至相互矛盾。其中一个原因是,密码研究的生态有效性问题的本质是难以研究的,因为缺乏基础真理。在本文中,我们提出了一项研究的生态有效性的密码研究专门设计来阐明这一问题。我们能够将645名研究参与者的行为与他们在现实世界中选择的密码进行比较。我们在启动和非启动条件下进行了在线和实验室研究,以评估这些不同形式的密码研究的效果。虽然我们的研究只能调查有限人群使用的一种特定密码环境,因此不能回答有关生态效度的所有问题,但它确实代表了判断生态效度对密码研究影响的重要第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Is Reporting Worth the Sacrifice of Revealing What I Have Sent?": Privacy Considerations When Reporting on End-to-End Encrypted Platforms Iterative Design of An Accessible Crypto Wallet for Blind Users Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1