Comparison between different thermal comfort models based on the exergy analysis

Anton Kerčov, Tamara Bajc, Milan Gojak, Maja Todorović, N. Pivac, S. Nižetić
{"title":"Comparison between different thermal comfort models based on the exergy analysis","authors":"Anton Kerčov, Tamara Bajc, Milan Gojak, Maja Todorović, N. Pivac, S. Nižetić","doi":"10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with an analysis of existing thermal comfort models based on exergy approach and the impact of models' input parameters to the calculation results. The aim of this paper is to present the results of the application of five different thermal comfort models based on the exergy analysis, to compare them, and to determine if they coincide with the results obtained by using Fanger's model. While models that are the most commonly used to evaluate and predict thermal comfort conditions are based on the first law of thermodynamics, a handful of authors used both the first and the second law of thermodynamics in order to develop new thermal comfort models. Even though the optimal comfort conditions according to these models may not differ by large margin from the optimal thermal comfort conditions according to Fanger's model, it is concluded that justification of using models based on the exergy analysis to evaluate thermal comfort is very dependent on the input parameters, which should all be taken into consideration separately,","PeriodicalId":295373,"journal":{"name":"2022 7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper deals with an analysis of existing thermal comfort models based on exergy approach and the impact of models' input parameters to the calculation results. The aim of this paper is to present the results of the application of five different thermal comfort models based on the exergy analysis, to compare them, and to determine if they coincide with the results obtained by using Fanger's model. While models that are the most commonly used to evaluate and predict thermal comfort conditions are based on the first law of thermodynamics, a handful of authors used both the first and the second law of thermodynamics in order to develop new thermal comfort models. Even though the optimal comfort conditions according to these models may not differ by large margin from the optimal thermal comfort conditions according to Fanger's model, it is concluded that justification of using models based on the exergy analysis to evaluate thermal comfort is very dependent on the input parameters, which should all be taken into consideration separately,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于火用分析的不同热舒适模型比较
分析了现有的基于火用法的热舒适模型,以及模型输入参数对计算结果的影响。本文的目的是介绍基于火用分析的五种不同的热舒适模型的应用结果,并对它们进行比较,并确定它们是否与使用Fanger模型得到的结果一致。虽然最常用于评估和预测热舒适条件的模型是基于热力学第一定律的,但少数作者同时使用热力学第一定律和第二定律来开发新的热舒适模型。尽管根据这些模型得出的最优舒适条件可能与根据Fanger模型得出的最优热舒适条件相差不大,但可以得出结论,使用基于火用分析的模型来评价热舒适的合理性很大程度上依赖于输入参数,这些参数都应该单独考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS: At a Glance Towards real time monitoring of an aeronautical machining process using scalable technologies Predicting TV Viewership with Regression Models Towards Consumer-Oriented Demand Response Systems RFID Thermal Monitoring Sheet (R-TMS) for Skin Temperature Measurements during Superficial Microwave Hyperthermia Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1