Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Online Review Helpfulness

Sirinda Palahan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Online Review Helpfulness","authors":"Sirinda Palahan","doi":"10.1145/3596286.3596300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exponential growth of online customer reviews has created challenges for potential buyers to filter and identify helpful reviews, directly affecting their shopping experience. Accurate prediction of review helpfulness can improve the selection and presentation of valuable reviews, leading to a better user experience and more informed purchasing decisions. To address the limitations of traditional machine learning methods that rely on handcrafted features and fail to capture semantic context, this paper presents a comparative analysis of existing deep learning models to predict the helpfulness of online reviews. Our study employs larger and more diverse datasets from three popular e-commerce platforms: TripAdvisor, Amazon, and Yelp, and compares multiple deep learning models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and DistilBert, to identify the most accurate and effective predictions. Additionally, the study compares the deep learning models to the traditional machine learning algorithm XGBoost. Understanding the benefits and limitations of each model can lead to improved model selection and optimization, resulting in more accurate and efficient predictions for a wide range of applications. The results show that CNN consistently outperforms the other deep learning models and XGBoost regarding Mean Squared Error (MSE) and training time across all datasets.","PeriodicalId":208318,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 Asia Conference on Computer Vision, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 Asia Conference on Computer Vision, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3596286.3596300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exponential growth of online customer reviews has created challenges for potential buyers to filter and identify helpful reviews, directly affecting their shopping experience. Accurate prediction of review helpfulness can improve the selection and presentation of valuable reviews, leading to a better user experience and more informed purchasing decisions. To address the limitations of traditional machine learning methods that rely on handcrafted features and fail to capture semantic context, this paper presents a comparative analysis of existing deep learning models to predict the helpfulness of online reviews. Our study employs larger and more diverse datasets from three popular e-commerce platforms: TripAdvisor, Amazon, and Yelp, and compares multiple deep learning models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and DistilBert, to identify the most accurate and effective predictions. Additionally, the study compares the deep learning models to the traditional machine learning algorithm XGBoost. Understanding the benefits and limitations of each model can lead to improved model selection and optimization, resulting in more accurate and efficient predictions for a wide range of applications. The results show that CNN consistently outperforms the other deep learning models and XGBoost regarding Mean Squared Error (MSE) and training time across all datasets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习模型预测在线评论有用性的比较分析
在线客户评论的指数级增长给潜在买家过滤和识别有用评论带来了挑战,直接影响了他们的购物体验。对评论有用性的准确预测可以改进有价值评论的选择和呈现,从而带来更好的用户体验和更明智的购买决策。为了解决传统机器学习方法依赖手工制作的特征和无法捕获语义上下文的局限性,本文对现有的深度学习模型进行了比较分析,以预测在线评论的有用性。我们的研究采用了来自三个流行电子商务平台(TripAdvisor、Amazon和Yelp)的更大和更多样化的数据集,并比较了多种深度学习模型,包括卷积神经网络(CNN)、循环神经网络(RNN)和蒸馏器,以确定最准确和有效的预测。此外,该研究还将深度学习模型与传统机器学习算法XGBoost进行了比较。了解每个模型的优点和局限性可以改进模型选择和优化,从而为广泛的应用程序提供更准确和有效的预测。结果表明,在所有数据集上,CNN在均方误差(MSE)和训练时间方面始终优于其他深度学习模型和XGBoost。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep Object Detection for Complex Architectural Floor Plans with Efficient Receptive Fields Skeleton-based Generative Adversarial Networks for Font Shape Style Transfer: Learning text style from some characters and transferring the style to any unseen characters Medical Image Segmentation Approach via Transformer Knowledge Distillation Self-adaptive Methods with Flexible Detection Criteria of the Battery Cell Dent Defect Improved Mask R-CNN Network Method for PV Panel Defect Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1