Legal Education: A New Growth Vision Part I—The Issue: Sustainable Growth or Dead Cat Bounce? A Strategic Inflection Point Analysis

Hilary G. Escajeda
{"title":"Legal Education: A New Growth Vision Part I—The Issue: Sustainable Growth or Dead Cat Bounce? A Strategic Inflection Point Analysis","authors":"Hilary G. Escajeda","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3170644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal education programs now face strategic inflection points. To survive and thrive long-term, education programs must embrace entrepreneurship, technology, innovation, platforms, and customer service as the means by which to navigate through strategic inflection points. Imagination, adaptability, agility, determination, and speed will separate market leaders from laggards. Scrappy, entrepreneurial, and action-oriented programs that deliver omni-channel, lifelong knowledge and skills development solutions are the movers that will radically redefine and likely dominate the legal education industry. Slow, tradition-bound programs resistant to change are non-movers that face extinction. \n \nEntrepreneurial education leaders committed to program growth know that since competitive advantages are transitory, they must create and nurture opportunities for continuous innovation. They also recognize the nexuses between customer satisfaction, institutional relevance, program solvency, and employee job security. These mindset shifts, coupled with a bias for action and modernization, will provide fruitful paths for new doctrinal and skill transfer services by legal education programs. \n \nWhile tinkers to student admissions and traditional business models may temporarily buffer the forces of creative destruction, the market will ultimately sort winners and losers. Because technology does not respect reputations or legacies, incumbent institutions face significant risks from flexible, adaptive and shape-shifting competitors that exploit emerging technologies. These shape-shifters rapidly respond to market changes by re-engineering and reinventing their business models, platforms, systems, and processes to capitalize on emerging trends—with an end goal of human-AI integration. \n \nBottom line: innovation represents the only firewall to obsolescence.","PeriodicalId":254923,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Growth (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Growth (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3170644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Legal education programs now face strategic inflection points. To survive and thrive long-term, education programs must embrace entrepreneurship, technology, innovation, platforms, and customer service as the means by which to navigate through strategic inflection points. Imagination, adaptability, agility, determination, and speed will separate market leaders from laggards. Scrappy, entrepreneurial, and action-oriented programs that deliver omni-channel, lifelong knowledge and skills development solutions are the movers that will radically redefine and likely dominate the legal education industry. Slow, tradition-bound programs resistant to change are non-movers that face extinction. Entrepreneurial education leaders committed to program growth know that since competitive advantages are transitory, they must create and nurture opportunities for continuous innovation. They also recognize the nexuses between customer satisfaction, institutional relevance, program solvency, and employee job security. These mindset shifts, coupled with a bias for action and modernization, will provide fruitful paths for new doctrinal and skill transfer services by legal education programs. While tinkers to student admissions and traditional business models may temporarily buffer the forces of creative destruction, the market will ultimately sort winners and losers. Because technology does not respect reputations or legacies, incumbent institutions face significant risks from flexible, adaptive and shape-shifting competitors that exploit emerging technologies. These shape-shifters rapidly respond to market changes by re-engineering and reinventing their business models, platforms, systems, and processes to capitalize on emerging trends—with an end goal of human-AI integration. Bottom line: innovation represents the only firewall to obsolescence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律教育:新的增长愿景——问题:可持续增长还是死猫反弹?战略拐点分析
法律教育项目现在面临战略拐点。为了长期生存和繁荣,教育项目必须拥抱创业、技术、创新、平台和客户服务,以此作为穿越战略拐点的手段。想象力、适应性、敏捷性、决心和速度将区分市场领先者和落后者。拼搏、创业和以行动为导向的项目提供全渠道、终身知识和技能发展解决方案,将从根本上重新定义并可能主导法律教育行业。缓慢的、传统的、抗拒改变的项目是面临灭绝的非推动者。致力于项目发展的创业教育领导者知道,由于竞争优势是暂时的,他们必须创造和培育持续创新的机会。他们还认识到客户满意度、机构相关性、项目偿付能力和员工工作保障之间的联系。这些观念的转变,加上对行动和现代化的偏爱,将为法律教育项目提供新的理论和技能转移服务提供富有成效的途径。虽然对招生和传统商业模式的修补可能暂时缓冲创造性破坏的力量,但市场最终将选出赢家和输家。由于技术不尊重声誉或遗产,现有机构面临着利用新兴技术的灵活、适应性强、不断变化的竞争对手带来的重大风险。这些“变形者”通过重新设计和改造他们的商业模式、平台、系统和流程来迅速响应市场变化,以利用新兴趋势——最终目标是人类与人工智能的整合。底线:创新是防止过时的唯一防火墙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economía de la complejidad: contribuciones para la paz con un enfoque sostenible (Economics of Complexity: Contributions for Peace from a Sustainable Approach) North American Natural Gas Markets under LNG Demand Growth and Infrastructure Restrictions Tourists’ Satisfaction towards Bao Loc City, Vietnam Environment Versus Jobs: An Industry-Level Analysis of Sweden A Review of Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment (Eshia) Practice in Nigeria: A Panacea for Sustainable Development and Decision Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1