{"title":"Tablets of Memory","authors":"S. Frampton","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190915407.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on one of the foundational images in Western epistemology: that memory is like a wax tablet. Charting the origins of the figure in the theories of mind of Plato and Aristotle through its development in the Roman practice of an oratorical ars memoriae (“art of memory”) as described by the Auctor ad Herennium, Cicero, and Quintilian, it recovers a variety of ways that writing and thinking were connected in the ancient imagination. Especially within theoretical handbooks of the discipline of Roman oratory, memory was understood fundamentally to be a practice dependent upon and at the service of written texts. From the tabula rasa to the “memory palace,” the tablet functioned as both tool and metaphor for Roman thought.","PeriodicalId":135237,"journal":{"name":"Empire of Letters","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empire of Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190915407.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter focuses on one of the foundational images in Western epistemology: that memory is like a wax tablet. Charting the origins of the figure in the theories of mind of Plato and Aristotle through its development in the Roman practice of an oratorical ars memoriae (“art of memory”) as described by the Auctor ad Herennium, Cicero, and Quintilian, it recovers a variety of ways that writing and thinking were connected in the ancient imagination. Especially within theoretical handbooks of the discipline of Roman oratory, memory was understood fundamentally to be a practice dependent upon and at the service of written texts. From the tabula rasa to the “memory palace,” the tablet functioned as both tool and metaphor for Roman thought.
本章聚焦于西方认识论的一个基本意象:记忆就像一块石碑。在柏拉图和亚里士多德的心智理论中描绘了人物的起源,通过它在罗马实践中的发展,如Auctor ad Herennium, Cicero和Quintilian所描述的,它恢复了写作和思考在古代想象中联系在一起的各种方式。尤其是在罗马演讲学的理论手册中,记忆从根本上被理解为一种依赖于书面文本并为之服务的实践。从白板到“记忆宫殿”,石板既是罗马思想的工具,也是罗马思想的隐喻。