IN DEFENCE OF CONTEMPORARY METHODOLOGY OF SCIENCE

V. Reznikov
{"title":"IN DEFENCE OF CONTEMPORARY METHODOLOGY OF SCIENCE","authors":"V. Reznikov","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article demonstrates that contemporary philosophers underestimate value of methodology of science. So on base of analysis of requests of applications of statistical methods I formulate such hypothesis. An acceptance of concept of holism is based on impossibility of verification of conditions of using of methods as part of scientific theories, but not on profound ideas. Because of, contrary to Popper on base of method of test procedure of statisti-cal hypothesis I show that falsification and verification are not absolutely different operations.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"58 7-8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article demonstrates that contemporary philosophers underestimate value of methodology of science. So on base of analysis of requests of applications of statistical methods I formulate such hypothesis. An acceptance of concept of holism is based on impossibility of verification of conditions of using of methods as part of scientific theories, but not on profound ideas. Because of, contrary to Popper on base of method of test procedure of statisti-cal hypothesis I show that falsification and verification are not absolutely different operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为当代科学方法论辩护
当代哲学家低估了科学方法论的价值。因此,在分析统计方法应用要求的基础上,提出了这样的假设。整体论概念的接受是基于不可能验证作为科学理论一部分的方法的使用条件,而不是基于深刻的思想。因为,与波普尔基于统计假设检验程序的方法相反,我证明了证伪和验证并不是绝对不同的操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classical philosophy in Novosibirsk Scientific Center. The pages of history The Philosophical Studies in Antiquity: Chapter of History THE CONCEPT OF UTILITY IN CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE'S PRAGMATISM IN A LABYRINTH OF CONTEXTS. Book Review: Philosophy and Its History. Discussions: Textbook / editor, introduction, translation and comments by M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk, 2021. 239 p. COMPARATIVE CONCEPTOLOGY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE USING GOOGLE NGRAM BOOKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1