A Rising Tide Lifts All Consumers: Penumbras of Foreign Data Protection Laws in the United States

MichaelD.E. Goodyear
{"title":"A Rising Tide Lifts All Consumers: Penumbras of Foreign Data Protection Laws in the United States","authors":"MichaelD.E. Goodyear","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3645085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growth of collecting, processing, and transferring personal information to third parties, consumers’ data is increasingly exposed to a myriad of risks. Perhaps chief among these are the data protection practices of data collectors themselves. Yet despite the risk to consumers, U.S. data protection law has remained fragmented, focused on individual industries at the federal law and only made comprehensive, occasionally, at the state level. This lack of a comprehensive data protection law in the United States is a significant detriment to the security of U.S. consumers. International law also offers no such path that could comprehensively protect U.S. consumers. <br><br>Yet U.S. consumers’ personal information is receiving additional protections from an unlikely source: foreign data protection laws. There is a growing global trend to adopt comprehensive data protection laws, with the European Union, Brazil, Japan, and others adopting such legislation in the past few years. This article examines nine of these laws from five different continents, looking at the global trends and disparities shown by this sample. The influence of these nine laws and other legislation creates distinct soft law benefits for U.S. consumers. They do this chiefly through economic pressures for U.S. data collectors to adopt a one-size-fits all approach, social pressures from increased privacy awareness by consumers, political pressures for the U.S. to adopt equivalent national legislation, and practical benefits from having a variety of different foreign models to observe and select. While reliance on foreign data protection laws is not a substitute for the United States adopting its own comprehensive federal data protection law, these penumbras that spill over from foreign data protection laws offer largely unexamined, but significant benefits for U.S. consumers.","PeriodicalId":102139,"journal":{"name":"Other Topics Engineering Research eJournal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Other Topics Engineering Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the growth of collecting, processing, and transferring personal information to third parties, consumers’ data is increasingly exposed to a myriad of risks. Perhaps chief among these are the data protection practices of data collectors themselves. Yet despite the risk to consumers, U.S. data protection law has remained fragmented, focused on individual industries at the federal law and only made comprehensive, occasionally, at the state level. This lack of a comprehensive data protection law in the United States is a significant detriment to the security of U.S. consumers. International law also offers no such path that could comprehensively protect U.S. consumers.

Yet U.S. consumers’ personal information is receiving additional protections from an unlikely source: foreign data protection laws. There is a growing global trend to adopt comprehensive data protection laws, with the European Union, Brazil, Japan, and others adopting such legislation in the past few years. This article examines nine of these laws from five different continents, looking at the global trends and disparities shown by this sample. The influence of these nine laws and other legislation creates distinct soft law benefits for U.S. consumers. They do this chiefly through economic pressures for U.S. data collectors to adopt a one-size-fits all approach, social pressures from increased privacy awareness by consumers, political pressures for the U.S. to adopt equivalent national legislation, and practical benefits from having a variety of different foreign models to observe and select. While reliance on foreign data protection laws is not a substitute for the United States adopting its own comprehensive federal data protection law, these penumbras that spill over from foreign data protection laws offer largely unexamined, but significant benefits for U.S. consumers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高涨的浪潮提升了所有消费者:美国外国数据保护法的半影
随着个人信息的收集、处理和向第三方转移的增长,消费者的数据越来越暴露于无数的风险之中。其中最主要的可能是数据收集者自身的数据保护措施。然而,尽管消费者面临风险,美国的数据保护法律仍然是支离破碎的,在联邦法律上专注于个别行业,只是偶尔在州一级进行全面的立法。美国缺乏全面的数据保护法,这对美国消费者的安全造成了重大损害。国际法也没有提供全面保护美国消费者的途径。然而,美国消费者的个人信息正从一个不太可能的来源获得额外的保护:外国数据保护法。采用全面的数据保护法是一种日益增长的全球趋势,欧盟、巴西、日本和其他国家在过去几年中采用了此类立法。本文研究了来自5个不同大陆的其中9条法律,研究了这个样本所显示的全球趋势和差异。这九项法律和其他立法的影响为美国消费者创造了明显的软法律利益。他们这样做的主要原因有:要求美国数据收集者采取“一劳适得”方法的经济压力、消费者隐私意识增强带来的社会压力、要求美国采用同等国家立法的政治压力,以及有各种不同的外国模式可供观察和选择所带来的实际利益。虽然对外国数据保护法的依赖并不能取代美国采用自己全面的联邦数据保护法,但这些从外国数据保护法中溢出的半影为美国消费者提供了很大程度上未经审查但却重要的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Information Sharing on Bullwhip Effect in a Non-Serial Supply Chain with Stochastic Lead Time On the Problem of the Specific Frequency of Globular Clusters A Polynomial Least Squares Multiple-Model Estimator: Simple, Optimal, Adaptive, and Practical Predicting and Improving Hydraulic Performance of Pumping Suction Intakes By Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Heptamethine and Nonamethine Cyanine Dyes: Novel Synthetic Strategy, Electronic Transitions, Solvatochromic and Halochromic Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1