Formation of new anthropological project of the modern education in the context of non-classical philosophy

I. Brylina
{"title":"Formation of new anthropological project of the modern education in the context of non-classical philosophy","authors":"I. Brylina","doi":"10.15293/2226-3365.1805.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . The author investigates the problem of rethinking the Western European classical heritage by the philosophy of education. The purpose of the research is to reveal the potential of nonclassical philosophy to the formation of a new anthropological project of modern education. Materials and Methods . The author uses methods of analysis and synthesis studying the genesis and evolution of education in different historical epochs: from Antiquity to the present day. The method of comparative analysis is applied to comparing and revealing the differences between anthropological projects of classical and nonclassical philosophy as ways of connecting man and education. The categories of Plato’s ‘taking care of the self’ and M. Foucault's ‘techniques of the self’ are explicated. Results. The connection between human evolution and transformation of education is clarified. The author analyses the changes of anthropological projects in the context of education evolution from Antiquity to the present day and compares Plato and M. Foucault’s practices of ‘taking care of the self’’. The potential of nonclassical philosophy to form a new anthropological project of modern education is revealed. Conclusions. It is concluded that the new anthropological project of education is different from classical projects which were based on the “ascent” to a single form, to the ideal, the model, the norm, the meaning, and the truth (Eidos - God - Beauty - Experience - Racio - Will). The main anthropological idea of modern university education is the strategy of self-determination, self-development and self-actualization of a learner.","PeriodicalId":226844,"journal":{"name":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1805.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction . The author investigates the problem of rethinking the Western European classical heritage by the philosophy of education. The purpose of the research is to reveal the potential of nonclassical philosophy to the formation of a new anthropological project of modern education. Materials and Methods . The author uses methods of analysis and synthesis studying the genesis and evolution of education in different historical epochs: from Antiquity to the present day. The method of comparative analysis is applied to comparing and revealing the differences between anthropological projects of classical and nonclassical philosophy as ways of connecting man and education. The categories of Plato’s ‘taking care of the self’ and M. Foucault's ‘techniques of the self’ are explicated. Results. The connection between human evolution and transformation of education is clarified. The author analyses the changes of anthropological projects in the context of education evolution from Antiquity to the present day and compares Plato and M. Foucault’s practices of ‘taking care of the self’’. The potential of nonclassical philosophy to form a new anthropological project of modern education is revealed. Conclusions. It is concluded that the new anthropological project of education is different from classical projects which were based on the “ascent” to a single form, to the ideal, the model, the norm, the meaning, and the truth (Eidos - God - Beauty - Experience - Racio - Will). The main anthropological idea of modern university education is the strategy of self-determination, self-development and self-actualization of a learner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非古典哲学语境下现代教育人类学新方案的形成
介绍。作者从教育哲学的角度探讨了对西欧古典遗产的重新思考问题。本研究的目的是揭示非古典哲学对形成一种新的现代教育人类学方案的潜力。材料与方法。作者运用分析与综合的方法,研究了从古至今不同历史时期教育的发生与演变。运用比较分析的方法,比较和揭示古典哲学与非古典哲学作为人与教育联系方式的人类学方案之间的差异。阐释了柏拉图的“照顾自我”和福柯的“自我技巧”的范畴。结果。阐明了人类进化与教育变革的关系。作者分析了古往今来教育演进背景下人类学项目的变迁,并比较了柏拉图与福柯的“照顾自我”实践。揭示了非古典哲学形成一种新的现代教育人类学方案的潜力。结论。结论是,新的人类学教育计划不同于古典计划,古典计划是基于对单一形式,理想,模式,规范,意义和真理(Eidos -上帝-美-经验-种族-意志)的“上升”。现代大学教育的主要人类学理念是学习者的自我决定、自我发展和自我实现策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing students’ professional competencies within an active educational environment Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective) Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education The regularities of developing students’ legal culture within a university educational environment Developing legal culture of a personality in the knowledge society: Conceptual foundations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1