European Integration Theory and the Future of the European Union after Brexit

Diogo Magalhaes
{"title":"European Integration Theory and the Future of the European Union after Brexit","authors":"Diogo Magalhaes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3533198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade all four areas of European integration – economic, social, legal and political – have faced a series of unprecedented crises that have shattered the foundations of the integration process and have thrown into question the future of the European Union. Among the many paradoxes that have riddled the integration project since its inception, none is more puzzling than the one the EU faces currently. Arguably never in any other time has the EU been so integrated and so successful as it is today, and likewise, never in any other time has there been a greater cognitive dissonance and distance between the peoples of Europe and the EU. This project argues that the greatest crisis afflicting the European project is an epistemological crisis, resulting from our continued failure to understand the processes and forces that drive European integration. Attempts to address questions regarding the future of Europe are failing precisely because we are attempting to answer Europe’s ontological question, without first answering Europe’s epistemological question, in other words, we are attempting to agree on a future for Europe without first understanding the very nature of the integration process, and if we persist on this fallacy we are doomed to fail in both pursuits, as we have been failing for the last seventy years. This project argues that in order to solve this paradox, in order to determine the future of the EU and overcome Europe’s crisis, we must adopt a systems theory approach to understand the complex adaptive nature of the integration process. A systems theory approach to European integration theory allows us to uncover and to understand the different inputs that both constrain and compel European integration and allows us to create predictive models of future integration and disintegration.","PeriodicalId":132443,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal","volume":"346 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3533198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last decade all four areas of European integration – economic, social, legal and political – have faced a series of unprecedented crises that have shattered the foundations of the integration process and have thrown into question the future of the European Union. Among the many paradoxes that have riddled the integration project since its inception, none is more puzzling than the one the EU faces currently. Arguably never in any other time has the EU been so integrated and so successful as it is today, and likewise, never in any other time has there been a greater cognitive dissonance and distance between the peoples of Europe and the EU. This project argues that the greatest crisis afflicting the European project is an epistemological crisis, resulting from our continued failure to understand the processes and forces that drive European integration. Attempts to address questions regarding the future of Europe are failing precisely because we are attempting to answer Europe’s ontological question, without first answering Europe’s epistemological question, in other words, we are attempting to agree on a future for Europe without first understanding the very nature of the integration process, and if we persist on this fallacy we are doomed to fail in both pursuits, as we have been failing for the last seventy years. This project argues that in order to solve this paradox, in order to determine the future of the EU and overcome Europe’s crisis, we must adopt a systems theory approach to understand the complex adaptive nature of the integration process. A systems theory approach to European integration theory allows us to uncover and to understand the different inputs that both constrain and compel European integration and allows us to create predictive models of future integration and disintegration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲一体化理论与英国脱欧后欧盟的未来
在过去十年中,欧洲一体化的所有四个领域- -经济、社会、法律和政治- -都面临着一系列前所未有的危机,这些危机破坏了一体化进程的基础,并使欧洲联盟的未来受到质疑。自一体化计划启动以来,就有许多悖论困扰着它,其中最令人困惑的莫过于欧盟目前面临的问题。可以说,欧盟从来没有像今天这样一体化、如此成功,同样,欧洲和欧盟人民之间也从来没有像今天这样存在如此大的认知失调和距离。本项目认为,困扰欧洲计划的最大危机是认识论危机,这是由于我们持续未能理解推动欧洲一体化的过程和力量而造成的。试图解决有关欧洲未来的问题之所以失败,正是因为我们试图回答欧洲的本体论问题,而没有首先回答欧洲的认识论问题,换句话说,我们试图在没有首先理解一体化过程的本质的情况下就欧洲的未来达成一致,如果我们坚持这种谬论,我们注定要在这两方面都失败,就像我们在过去七十年中一直失败的那样。本项目认为,为了解决这一悖论,为了确定欧盟的未来并克服欧洲的危机,我们必须采用系统理论的方法来理解一体化过程的复杂适应性。欧洲一体化理论的系统理论方法使我们能够发现和理解约束和迫使欧洲一体化的不同输入,并使我们能够创建未来一体化和解体的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voting from Abroad: Assessing the Impact of Local Turnout on Migrants' Voting behavior The Eurozone: From the Concept of Financial Stability to the Reality of Deficits and Debts Court Productivity and Trade-off between Judicial Speed and Verdict Length: Evidence from the Court of Justice of the European Union} Capital Reallocation and Firm-Level Productivity Under Political Uncertainty Set in Stone? Conflict and Continuity Over the European Union’s Measurement of Government Debt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1