Relations between Abs-Normal NLPs and MPCCs. Part 2: Weak Constraint Qualifications

L. C. Hegerhorst-Schultchen, C. Kirches, M. Steinbach
{"title":"Relations between Abs-Normal NLPs and MPCCs. Part 2: Weak Constraint\n Qualifications","authors":"L. C. Hegerhorst-Schultchen, C. Kirches, M. Steinbach","doi":"10.46298/jnsao-2021-6673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work continues an ongoing effort to compare non-smooth optimization\nproblems in abs-normal form to Mathematical Programs with Complementarity\nConstraints (MPCCs). We study general Nonlinear Programs with equality and\ninequality constraints in abs-normal form, so-called Abs-Normal NLPs, and their\nrelation to equivalent MPCC reformulations. We introduce the concepts of\nAbadie's and Guignard's kink qualification and prove relations to MPCC-ACQ and\nMPCC-GCQ for the counterpart MPCC formulations. Due to non-uniqueness of a\nspecific slack reformulation suggested in [10], the relations are non-trivial.\nIt turns out that constraint qualifications of Abadie type are preserved. We\nalso prove the weaker result that equivalence of Guginard's (and Abadie's)\nconstraint qualifications for all branch problems hold, while the question of\nGCQ preservation remains open. Finally, we introduce M-stationarity and\nB-stationarity concepts for abs-normal NLPs and prove first order optimality\nconditions corresponding to MPCC counterpart formulations.\n","PeriodicalId":250939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46298/jnsao-2021-6673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work continues an ongoing effort to compare non-smooth optimization problems in abs-normal form to Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints (MPCCs). We study general Nonlinear Programs with equality and inequality constraints in abs-normal form, so-called Abs-Normal NLPs, and their relation to equivalent MPCC reformulations. We introduce the concepts of Abadie's and Guignard's kink qualification and prove relations to MPCC-ACQ and MPCC-GCQ for the counterpart MPCC formulations. Due to non-uniqueness of a specific slack reformulation suggested in [10], the relations are non-trivial. It turns out that constraint qualifications of Abadie type are preserved. We also prove the weaker result that equivalence of Guginard's (and Abadie's) constraint qualifications for all branch problems hold, while the question of GCQ preservation remains open. Finally, we introduce M-stationarity and B-stationarity concepts for abs-normal NLPs and prove first order optimality conditions corresponding to MPCC counterpart formulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abs-Normal nlp与mpcc的关系第2部分:弱约束条件
这项工作继续进行了一项正在进行的工作,将abs-范式的非光滑优化问题与具有互补性约束的数学程序(mpcc)进行比较。我们研究了具有ab -正规形式的等式和不等式约束的一般非线性规划,即所谓的ab -正规nlp,以及它们与等效MPCC重新表述的关系。我们引入了abadie’s和Guignard’s扭结限定的概念,并证明了对应的MPCC配方与MPCC- acq和MPCC- gcq的关系。由于在[10]中提出的具体松弛重构公式的非唯一性,关系是非平凡的。结果表明,Abadie类型的约束条件是保留的。我们还证明了Guginard(和Abadie)约束条件对所有分支问题的等价性较弱的结果,而gcq守恒问题仍然是开放的。最后,我们引入了abs-normal nlp的m -平稳性和b -平稳性概念,并证明了MPCC对应公式的一阶最优性条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Control of a Viscous Two-Field Damage Model with Fatigue Proximal gradient methods beyond monotony Analysis of the implicit Euler time-discretization of passive linear descriptor complementarity systems On Convergence of Binary Trust-Region Steepest Descent Second-order conditions for non-uniformly convex integrands: quadratic growth in $L^1$
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1